User talk:75.3.23.157

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Richard_M._Daley or to The_Enemy_of_My_Enemy#Synopsis, for example, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Yonmei 17:14, 30 September 2006 (UTC)


You have recently vandalized several Wikipedia articles: , and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

We hope that you will become a legitimate editor. Again, you are welcome here at Wikipedia, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.

If you feel you have received this message in error, it may be because you are using a shared IP address. Nevertheless, repeated vandalism from this address may cause you to be included in any future sanctions such as temporary blocks or bans. To avoid confusion in the future, we invite you to create a user account of your own.


Please do not edit my Talk page to add personally insulting suggestions. I am not anti-Catholic. I was fixing a biographical article that you had vandalized. Yonmei 21:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia. If you have an issue with a link on Edward Cardinal Egan's biography page, take it up on the Biographies of living persons. You appear to have a pattern of removing material from wiki pages because you don't like the content (as your repeated vandalizing of Mychal F. Judge), and of responding with personal attacks when your edits are reverted. Yonmei 22:33, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi, just a note that Wikipedia is not a place to try and promote a certain POV (point-of-view), please be neutral when editing. Thanks!! --82.42.147.253 17:06, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you.

Contents

[edit] "Double Standards"

Right off the bat, please read WP:POINT. Yes, sometimes editors can assume bad faith. Try posting on the talk page and discussing with other editors further. If you need any help, please comment back to me. Yanksox 00:05, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Here's the thing, the article is a written article from a somewhat journal and is actually relevant to the topic. The link you are adding is blantantly gaming Wikipedia just to get a POV across. Not everything can be unbias, but we try our damnest here, the article you are wishing to put in is mudsligning. The link they have is somewhat related along the lines of the topic in a more academic tone. Yanksox 00:11, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Three Revert Rule

75.3.23.157, I believe you had passed your three revert limit in 24 hours on the Mychal F. Judge page well before I counted up my reverts and realised that I was at that limit myself.

Your last edit to Edward Cardinal Egan was your fourth edit within 24 hours, also putting you over the "three revert rule".

Please read the WP:3RR article and bear this in mind for the future. Yonmei 09:19, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kucinich

Kucinich is a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which supports gay marriage, and has voted against every bill that puts restrictions on abortion in the last few years. Thanks for your concerns, though. —Gunsnroads 02:05, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent behavior

Hello, 75.3.23.157. (Do you have a name you'd like to be called? Or would you like to consider creating an account?)

An editor whom I respect recently drew my attention to the dispute you've been having about the Mychal F. Judge article. First of all, let me say that content disputes of this sort are quite common on Wikipedia, and many dispute resolution processes have evolved in response. I strongly recommend that you and the other editors try to find a way through this: perhaps informal or formal mediation would be helpful.

As I look at the dispute, it seems to me that you haven't always assumed good faith of your fellow editors. "Assume good faith" is a key principle of Wikipedia, vital to its workings. If you assume that every edit you disagree with is motivated by prejudice, you will not be able to participate in the collaborative editing that is the essence of Wikipedia.

In particular, edits like this, this, this and this are completely unacceptable. Please see the Wikipedia policies about personal attacks and civility.

You've also had your attention drawn to WP:POINT. Your dispute is about the Mychal Judge article; please keep it there. If you wish to draw the attention of others to your concerns about the article, you may consider filing a request for comment. Edits like this, and your attempt at parallelism with Bill Clinton are classic violations of WP:POINT; please don't do that again.

The way you're going about things isn't helpful or productive. However, that doesn't mean that your concerns can't be addressed. If you pursue mediation, it's likely that you and the other editors may find common ground, and reach a compromise position acceptable to both sides. However, confrontation and personal attacks will result in escalation, possibly including administrator action. If you make further personal attacks, you may be blocked for disruption. But if you assume good faith and work with rather than against your fellow editors, you may find that the outcome you seek is within your reach. The choice is yours. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 06:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

I second Josiah Rowe's suggestion that you create an account. Your IP address has now acquired a history of confrontational behaviour and poor editing practices from when you were new to wikipedia. If you feel you are now more familiar with wikipedia standards of behaviour, you could lose your record and start fresh with a user account name. In this way you won't have your previous disruptive record lagging behind you, and (looking at most of your recent edits) I get the impression that you have learned a lot about how to be a wikpedia editor. Go for it! Yonmei 11:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Editing my Talk page

You seem to have just made, and deleted, half a dozen edits on my Talk page. I'm uncertain why you deleted the two original comments - you refrained from personal attack, and I would have been happy to reply to them - but thank you for restoring the section about the Drabulov vandalism that you deleted. Yonmei 19:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC

[edit] Daley edits

I added a section to the Daley Talk page. You may well be able to make a case for eliminating those sections entirely: I would suggest that you do so, rather than simply deleting them and making claims that the wikipedians who inserted them were "Republican party operatives". Yonmei 19:31, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

"removing sections which are news stories, some of which unrelated to the subject matter or not notable." - Just a quick note to say Yes, that's the kind of thing I meant. Other editors of the Daley page may or may not agree with you, but giving this kind of reason in your Summary edit (and, I think, posting on the Talk page to say what you've done and why you've done it) is far better than making accusations about the motivation of the people who put those sections in. Yonmei 08:53, 1 October 2006 (UTC)