User talk:75.21.179.121

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Gamaliel (Orwellian Cyber hell master) 03:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fox News Channel

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Fox News Channel. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. /Blaxthos 20:26, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. /Blaxthos 20:33, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fox News Channel

It is you who is violating the neutral point of view policy. You see, when you say something that uses weasel words, it automatically violates the npov policy. You and i both know that statement violates the policy, so i wouldn't be using it as an excuse to continue the anti-FNC plight that you and other users have continued on. Frankly, i really don't know why someone would hate a cable news network so much as to want to destroy it on wikipedia. perhaps you could answer that in the fnc article while others remove it but then you come in again and re-add it claiming a breach of the npov policy. Oh, and here's your signature: --75.21.179.121 23:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Go easy on the incivility. The current version is a consensus version in which your concerns have already been asked and answered. I also advise checking out WP:LEAD -- It is absolutely appropriate to mention the controversy in the intro, as it is widespread and sigifnicant. I suggest checking out past discussion and the consensus before demanding unilateral changes. In fact, if you look on the talk page you'll notice at the very top this is all already covered in our FAQ. /Blaxthos 05:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)