User talk:75.132.95.79

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Joyce Meyer

Please provide a valid citation for the change else it is just Original Research. SparrowsWing (talk) 01:33, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Simply stating something is not a valid citation. If you revert your edit again, I will report you for violation of WP:3RR. See WP:OR if you don't understand what I mean about original research. SparrowsWing (talk) 02:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Avoid weasel words and don't advance your own point of view in an article. You are supposed to let the reader draw conclusions for themselves. I suggest you read some of the Wikipedia help articles before editing further. SparrowsWing (talk) 03:16, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Please read people's responses before re-editing. Present the facts of a situation e.g A hired B. That in itself should be sufficient. The word "knowingly" is a loaded word. If people require more information, let them read the referenced article without causing them to form an assumption. Wikipedia is supposed to be about 'unbiased' editing not getting your own opinion across. SparrowsWing (talk) 03:22, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Reverted as per WP:3RR An editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, on a single page within a 24-hour period. A revert means undoing the actions of another editor, whether involving the same or different material each time. SparrowsWing (talk) 03:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bad understanding of what an encyclopedia is

Mr. 75.132.95.79, blatantly deleting material that was written very painstakingly and cautiously so that to try to present a balanced view, with a simple remark "What???..." (referring to this edit - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Word_of_Faith&diff=152607839&oldid=152444770 ) shows that you have a very bad understanding indeed of what an encyclopedia is. Please use talk pages, or your engagement in Wikipedia won't last very long. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Latreia (talk • contribs) 15:46, August 21, 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 20:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] No personal attacks

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Word of Faith. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. · jersyko talk 21:38, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

I also wanted to note that I essentially agree with your argument there. Please, though, be more civil. · jersyko talk 21:41, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Charismatic Movement

Please observe the Wikipedia three edit revert rule. As your statement on Pentecostalism has now been reverted by three separate editors could you discuss its merits on the talk page rather than just reinstating it on the page with funny comments. If you do have a relevent edit then please use referencing to back up the statement. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nshimbi (talk • contribs) 22:42, August 23, 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 21:34, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 21:44, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia is not a soapbox

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Christian feminism are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. Thank you. This diff shows this IP adding soapboxing commentry to the above article's talk page which is a violation of wikipedia's talk page guide lines--Cailil talk 21:34, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:Christian feminism for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you.--Cailil talk 22:15, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Christian views about women for inappropriate discussion, as described here, you may be blocked.
[1] This edit is incivil, it is a personal attack and it is using WP like a forum - please review policy. This is your 3rd warning for not using talk pages properly--Cailil talk 17:58, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 15:14, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Refactoring other users' comments

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Christian feminism , is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Your actions here are in violation of WP:TALK - the guidelines on how to use a talk page. Do not alter another editor's comments, it can be considered vandalism Cailil talk 11:08, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 04:49, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

With regard to your comments on Christian views about women: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Icestorm815 03:49, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] edit warring at Christian views about women

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --Cailil talk 17:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

You are edit warring at Christian views about women please stop. Please be aware that editors don't have to make 3 reverts or disputed edits within 24 hours to break WP:3RR, it is a policy against disruptive editting and blocks for it are at sysops discretion if a pattern of tendentious edits can be seen. Please read WP:Consensus to see how to effectively build consensus and improve wikipedia articles. With reference to this edit - you removed reliably sourced material. The facts the <ref=Staggs/> is a reference to Stagg, Evelyn and Frank. Woman in the World of Jesus. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1978. which was deleted during your edit war. Your edit summary claiming this material was not reliable sourced is either misleading or mistaken.--Cailil talk 17:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 month as a result of your disruptive edits to Talk:Bosnians. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Duja► 11:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Block extended to three months

Your beliefs appear to be sincere, but more appropriate for a blog or private website than here. This block extension is for sockpuppetry on A B Pepper. Also applicable: What Wikipedia is Not, Neutral Point of View, Single-Purpose Account, Disruptive Editing, No Personal Attacks, Civility.DurovaCharge! 05:46, 27 September 2007 (UTC)