User talk:75.109.101.139

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! -- Alf melmac 18:44, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Should Sin be on Wikipedia?

Should it? Mate, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and as such, it is a store of mass amounts of knowledge, including 'sins' such as Da Vinci code. Da Vinci code may be a Sin, but Christianity is the greatest Sin of them all. Anyway, I won't get into a huge discussion about this, but nothing is censored off this website, that includes Pornography, swearing or 'Sins', removing something like that is absolutely childish. The Haunted Angel 21:24, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not edit the user pages of other contributors without their approval or consent, as you did with User:H.J. Bellamy. It may be seen as vandalism. --Alex (Talk) 22:26, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re. discussion on The Haunted Angel's talk page

Please, you really should give up this silly discussion as it is going nowhere. And if you continue disrupting you will get banned. Thank you. --Alex (Talk) 23:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You have been blocked

You have been blocked for trolling and vandalism over several days for a period of 31 hours. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Luna Santin 00:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

unblock Please unblock me, luna. If you do unblock me i will never return to Haunted Angels page again I swear i wont. 75.109.101.139 00:08, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

You wern't just blocked for Vandalising my page, but for vandalising many pages. You blanked an entire user's page, you blanked the whole Da Vinci Code article, you constantly told people off for contributing to Da Vinci Code. You were banned for doing this to Wikipedia, and if you persist in doing it after your ban expires, you will be banned again for a longer period of time. Quite frankly, because of everything you've been doing, you deserve it, and I told you I'd have you banned. Hopefully when the ban is lifted you will decide to help Wikipedia rather then degrade it. The Haunted Angel 00:16, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

If this block is lifted I wont ever bother anything again. will start my own website all Christian so please undo the block. Please. 75.109.101.139 00:34, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Are you implying that if the block isn't lifted, then you will carry on with vandalism after it expires? The Haunted Angel 12:53, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

No Im just saying I will start a website elsewhere. I will not bother you or matt again. Have a heart 75.109.101.139 00:30, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reminder

Contrary to your statement on October 8, 2006 that you would leave The Haunted Angel alone, you still appear to be arguing with him.[1] As you have previously established a history of trolling, it is advised that you simply let the matter drop. Feel free to think that The Haunted Angel is going to burn in Hell, just don't tell him as much. EVula 02:53, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

All right I will leave him alone 75.109.101.139 03:27, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you. EVula 04:40, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

I've had a look at your discussion with The Haunted Angel. As a neutral third party who agrees with Voltaire ("I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"), I'd like to let you know of my observation that neither you nor the Haunted Angel have conducted yourselves in an appropriate manner (with reference to appropriate and detailed Wikipedia policies).
However, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and needs to a wide range of topics, exactly like the Encyclopedia Britannica (which I know had a wide coverage on, say, the Da Vinci Code. Your belief in Christianity is welcome - well it should be, anyway - but your desire to impose that belief by disrupting the project is not. Now the Wikipedia process is far from perfect, but I don't share your vision for the project. While this disruption occurs, I can empathize with The Haunted Angel, as this makes it difficult to assume good faith as per nom.
You might like to check out the Christianity Wikia. Best, nkayesmith 05:54, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Reply: I didn't criticize your Christian beliefs - I apologize if you received that impression.
What I'm trying to say is your religion, or my religion, or anyone's religion is not relevant.
Wikipedia aims to be a encyclopedia which accepts that everybody's Points of View exist, and does not make any judgments whatsoever on anyone's point of view. This is the vision the founders of Wikipedia had, and this is what an Encylopedia should be. In my opinion, it is also Christian teaching to accept other people's point of view, but, again, this is not important.
Now, every article may not conform to this vision, and it is up to you and me and all other editors to rectify this situation - not by removing any content, but by improving content so that no judgments are made. For example, it is safe to say that certain Christian groups disapprove of the Da Vinci Code, but it is not correct to remove the information on the Da Vinci Code altogether, or say that the Da Vinci Code is bad.
I did not talk to the Haunted Angel because you have not conducted yourself appropriately to start with, and so I can understand where the Haunted Angel is coming from. Perhaps I was wrong in this - Wikipedia is only the sum of its parts, and the editors are only human; as humans we make mistakes. But the real intention of my message was to let you know that if you conduct yourself appropriately, people like the Haunted Angel should not insult your religion, and I - and other editors - will make sure that they don't.
The information in Wikipedia is legally free; the moment anybody successfully manages to compromise the neutrality policy like you are proposing Wikipedia will fall, because it is because the information is neutral that people come. And because the information is free, an alternative encylopedia can be set up within minutes. I would therefore advise against buying Wikipedia (even if that was possible).
Please understand that I am not attacking you, or anything you believe in - and I thank you sincerely for behaving likewise - This is what Wikipedia is meant to be like. --nkayesmith 02:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Warnings

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Coronation Street. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Alex (Talk) 01:03, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Coronation Street, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Gwernol 01:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Hello, 75.109.101.139, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that recently there have been potentially unwanted edits made using this IP or account. Therefore, for the time being, your edits will be monitored closely to make sure that they are in accord with our policies and guidelines, and reverted if necessary. I just thought I should let you know. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 01:35, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

You may absolutely not add fake information to Wikipedia articles. If you do you will be blocked. I note above that you have been blocked before. Please understand that your hoax material is not welcome in an encyclopedia. There are many free web hosts available where you can post anything you want, please use one of those instead of ruining Wikipedia. Oh, and do not blank sections of my talk page again either. Its rude and will lead to your being blocked. Gwernol 01:38, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You have been blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia  for vandalism. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of our neutrality policy are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.  Glen  01:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC)


Please do not remove legitimate notices from your page. Removing the notice does not lift the block, but vandalizing your own talk page in this manner will lead to the block being extended. Thanks, Gwernol 03:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unblock Me Now

This block because of one page I edited imagination on is stupid. If I am not unblocked in two hours I will sue whoever blocked me and buy Wikipedia and then block everyone who played a part in this ban. 75.109.101.139 19:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Please request any unblocks properly, as described in the block message. Thank you. --Alex (Talk) 19:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:No_legal_threats. --nkayesmith 21:51, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

All right Im sorry, but I edited on article with imagination ONE TIME and I was banned. That is why Im mad. 75.109.101.139 22:58, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Age of consent

Am curious, where do you live? You might need to think about your situation, it is probably illegal. And this in reference to this edit. Mathmo Talk 15:45, 21 January 2007 (UTC)