User talk:75.1.244.104

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of 71.156.47.81‎.
Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/71.156.47.81‎ for evidence.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs

[edit] October 2007

You have repeatedly been warned to stop your vandalism of articles, such as those you made to ER (TV series), on Wikipedia when you came here using other IPs. Please stop. You are welcome to contribute real edits to Wikipedia but all vandalism done by you will be reverted and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia if you continue. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

We hope that you will become a legitimate editor and create an account. Again, you are welcome here at Wikipedia, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.

If you feel you have received this message in error, it may be because you are using a shared IP address. Nevertheless, repeated vandalism from this address may cause you to be included in any future sanctions such as temporary blocks or bans. To avoid confusion in the future, we invite you to create a user account of your own. Wisdom89 03:33, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to House (TV series). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Dave (Talk | contribs) 03:35, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

you are vandalizing the page, you are the true vandal here

[edit] Core policies

Please familiarize yourself with WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not a Soapbox to promote your POV Wisdom89 03:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Please familiarize yourself with WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not a Soapbox to promote your RACIST POV--75.1.244.104 04:46, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

If the scarcity of Asian actors on a particular television show is noteworthy, it will have been commented on by a reliable source. If you can find such a source, the information can be added to the article. Continuing to hop from IP to IP will not help you get this information into the article. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 05:01, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

if the weather is hot, do you need a reliable source for that, too? do you see any Asian in this show? can you count? i hope that your math skill is good

If you want to put something about hot weather in a city in an article, yes, you would have to find a reliable source. Fortunately, it would not be difficult. Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability. The criteria for something being included in Wikipedia are verifiability and notability, not truth. The sidewalk outside my house is cracked. That's true, but it's not notable or verifiable by reliable sources. If I wanted to add something about that cracked sidewalk to an article on my hometown, I'd have to find a reliable source commenting on it. The same goes for the lack of Asians on these programs. (Plus, as has frequently been pointed out to you, Kal Penn and Parminder Nagra are Asian.)
At this point, the issue has become your use of sock puppet accounts, which is also against Wikipedia policies. If you continue to use different IPs to insert the passage you want, I will block you for sockpuppetry. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 05:08, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on House (TV Series). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Wisdom89 05:08, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please refrain from incivility Wisdom89 05:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sockpuppetry, violating the three-revert rule and making personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

—Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 05:28, 24 October 2007 (UTC)