User talk:74.93.6.213

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] April 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. If you're tagging the article for POV, please provide a coherent discussion of what and what, rather than making vague statements. Acroterion (talk) 18:37, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Also, you appear to be operating under two (2) different names. You signed the previously un-signed comment originally made and recorded by wikipedia as follows:
    (cur) (last)  20:08, 18 April 2008 Gifttimes (Talk | contribs) (82,371 bytes) (→Reasons for POV tag: new section) (undo)

You have two choices: either explain your objections in detail, with a suggestion for improvement, or you face blocking for 3RR. POV tags aren't meant for issues of copyediting (as in you concern about piling on the adjectives). I have suggested an RfC to bring other opinions onto the page. You are encouraged to participate constructively, but please desist from simply tagging the page - this serves no good purpose. Acroterion (talk) 20:30, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

It is useless for you to keep Tagging the page without giving specific indications where you believe there is a POV situation. Or is it that you just believe that there is some truth to the Conspiracy Theory that the Jews are out to take over the world. Is that what you want us to say? I have no idea what you want. I think you should be blocked because you do not show Good Faith. --Ludvikus (talk) 18:40, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 21:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Acroterion (talk) 21:33, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You've clearly crossed the line into edit-warring. Please reconsider your editing methods. If you wish to offer constructive changes, you are welcome to do so, but several editors have now explained what the POV tag is for - and this isn't it. Acroterion (talk) 21:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)