User talk:74.73.251.39

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Hello, 74.73.251.39

The reason the relationships section of the EJ Wells article keeps getting changed back to "forced sex" next to Sami Brady's name is because the "rape" topic is an opinion. Many people believe what EJ did to Sami is not rape. Just as many people believe what he did to Sami is rape. The wording "Forced sex" is a tad more neutral. Flyer22 14:01, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

  • obviously there's no talking to this IP as they keep repeatedly changing it back and several of us keep changing it back to forced sex regardless of our personal belief. This "rape" change really nees to stop. 75.181.107.214 03:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Thanks u E.J is very bad and I will like u to delete E.J. Wells.
    • You can not delete a character page just because you don't like him. If you don't like him, ignore his page. It's that easy. I don't like Lucas but I don't vandalize his page. Please refrain from vandalizing the EJ Wells page.CelticGreen 00:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Do not edit other users' talk page comments. This is considered vandalism and may result in a block from editing. (ESkog)(Talk) 12:41, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

This is your final warning. Editing user comments to make it look like they said things they did not say is severe vandalism. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:24, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

If you cannot even spell a word and do not have verifiable information, do not change pages. EJ Wells has not been charged with any crimes and therefore has no victums, which is spelled with an I not a U. You can also not include your assumptions that EJ is to blame for events that haven't taken place. Refrain from vandalizing the EJ Wells page or you will be reported.IrishLass0128 17:22, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Your continued vandalism has been reported.IrishLass0128 17:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Dear 74.73.251.39, hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from EJ Wells. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content without a good reason, (which should be specified in the edit summary.) Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia! If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.- Ariel♥Gold 03:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

}}}Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Jeremy Horton. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked for continuing to edit other users' messages on Talk pages, and for other vandalism to Wikipedia. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to EJ Wells, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: EJ Wells was changed by 74.73.251.39 (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-12-13T20:00:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:00, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to EJ Wells (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 20:01, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits to the Children of Salem, Days of our Lives article have been reverted. Alice Caroline's name is ALI, short for ALIce. Do not change it again as this will constitute vandalism. IrishLass (talk) 13:58, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

Your continued vandalism to List of Days of our Lives cast members has been reverted. Crystal is a psychic, not a phychic. The page you directed her name to is up for speedy deletion which will likely occur. Do not continue to put false and made up names on the Days' cast list. Doing so again will result in a formal report. IrishLass (talk) 17:45, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User:Flyer22, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Randomtime (talk) 18:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
As you appear to be unfamiliar with the storyline, Jack and Kayla were lovers first, then married, then he raped her which is noted. Changing all the incidents of "lover" to "he raped her" is vandalism. You need to discontinue this behaviour. IrishLass (talk) 17:23, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

  jj137 ♠ 00:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] No, we won't shut up

Do not add unverified content to the Colleen Brady article as you did. Wikipedia is for verifiable content, not speculation. Your edits have been reverted. KellyAna (talk) 23:12, 1 February 2008 (UTC)