User talk:74.72.53.149

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Martin Page, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Martin Page was changed by 74.72.53.149 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-11-13T05:39:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 05:39, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Please don't vandalize Wikipedia, like you did to Martin Page article. Drunken Pirate 06:42, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

You have now been blocked for a period of 48 hours due to your incivility --MoRsE (talk) 18:23, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unblock request

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "All this, because I have written an article for the French author Martin Page and requested a disambiguation to be added to the article already in the system for the musician Martin Page. My repeated additions for the disambiguation have been repeatedly deleted. My written article has disappeared without its approval or disapproval.

I understand that a level of civility is needed to meet Wikipedia's high standards and I apologize for my frustration leading me to violate the TOS; however, I also understand that adding a valid article and disambiguation - which I have submitted with significant, easily verifyable sources, should not require as much time as this. No wonder Wikipedia has such a poor reputation for lack of fact and for its being manipulated for capitalistic purposes.

I would have NO interest in ever writing -or reading- from ANY of the wiki projects anymore should this block remain in effect."

Decline reason: "No, 48 hours because of this obscene comment. Relax for the 48 hours and come back without nastiness. — jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 06:57, 18 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] Vandalism to Criticism of Wikipedia - warning 1

Thank you for experimenting with the page Criticism of Wikipedia on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. 06:41, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] afc

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Martin Page (author) was created. Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself. Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)