User talk:74.64.94.137

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Hannah Montana

Your recent edit to Hannah Montana (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 00:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. bibliomaniac15 00:57, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to August 21

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to August 21. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 00:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Raven Symone

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. bibliomaniac15 Review? 03:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Kay Panabaker

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Kay Panabaker, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Alex43223 Talk | Contribs | E-mail 03:02, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Miley Stewart (Hannah Montana)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. bibliomaniac15 01:09, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. HappiestCamper 17:02, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Kay Panabaker. As a member of the Wikipedia community, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information of living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article must include proper sources. Thank you. Andrew_pmk | Talk 17:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kim Rhodes, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please read WP:NOT to see what Wikipedia is not to be used for. For example, Wikipedia is not for rumors. --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 19:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles, as you did at Kim Rhodes. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wikipedia is NOT for rumors! And we don't need to list a person's kids. --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 22:24, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding Kim Rhodes' kids to her article. They are not notable AND unsourced. --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 19:43, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

As you chose to reinsert unsourced biographical information which has been repeatedly challenged here, against the prior warnings here, I'm blocking your account for 31 hours.

All edits to biographical Wikipedia articles must comply with our biographies of living persons policy. This requires careful attention to reliable sources and sensitivity to avoiding speculation and unsourced allegations. You are currently editing rather blatantly in violation of those policies... If you keep it up, your ability to edit Wikipedia in the future will be rather severely curtailed. Please stop. Edit within the policies and use reliable sources.

Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert 19:04, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

[edit] Kim Rhodes' children

Saying you are a "friend of Kims" does not constitude as a reliable source. Weather you really are or not, this type of stuff will not be tolerated on Wikipedia! If you do it again, you will be reported again, and blocked for even longer, if not indefinetly. --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 05:30, 27 August 2007 (UTC)