User talk:74.231.186.24

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An archive of older warnings to 74.231.186.24 is available at /Archive 1.

[edit] March 2008

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to General contractor, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Keith D (talk) 20:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to John Campbell, 9th Duke of Argyll, you will be blocked from editing. --Oxymoron83 17:31, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to John Campbell, 9th Duke of Argyll, you will be blocked from editing. Whether or not you think a man is a 'stupid woman' is irrelevant. If you believe your edit(s) did contribute positively to the article, please discuss them on the article's talk page and notify me so I can improve my anti-vandal efforts. George D. Watson (Dendodge).TalkHelp 17:33, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You have been blocked for a period of 56 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Oxymoron83 17:35, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Education in Canada. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Caltas (talk) 18:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Education in Canada, you will be blocked from editing. Caltas (talk) 18:59, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Education in Canada. DougsTech (talk) 19:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Degrassi. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Collectonian (talk) 18:55, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your recent edit to Josh Hutcherson (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 19:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to The Marine Biologist has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 19:03, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Louisiana State University has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 19:20, 2 May 2008 (UTC)