User talk:74.208.73.158

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] December 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Bacone College, you will be blocked from editing. Nick Martin (talk) 07:05, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Bacone College, you will be blocked from editing. --BrokenSphereMsg me 07:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Bacone College, you will be blocked from editing. Nick Martin (talk) 07:11, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Shoessss |  Chat  07:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 2 days from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. WODUP 07:14, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to SR Merchant Navy Class, you will be blocked from editing. Kuru talk 20:49, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Igoldste (talk) 21:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 17:53, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.

I acknowledge that the grammar might be hinky, but you really, really need to discuss the change on the article's talk page. While the existing grammar is not optimal, adding "etc." in place of it is not really a solution. Please propose an alternate phrasing, or perhaps an alternative sentence structure, at the article's talkpage, which may be found here. Further reverts of this article may result in your being blocked from editing. Thank you. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 18:01, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

With all due respect, all I'm saying is that the article has been disputed for the past few hours regarding this very subject, and one user has already been blocked for edit warring. I agree that the grammar is bad - I even said so on your talk page - but, continuing to revert the material is precisely the wrong way to get it out of the article, as it will result in your being blocked. Make a post about the problem on the talk page, and I'll bet you can get people to agree to the removal of that section, or maybe even a new paragraph that includes the information in a grammatically correct way. But, if you continue to revert, chances are good that you'll be blocked for violation of the Three-Revert Rule. Best, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 18:06, 20 March 2008 (UTC)