User talk:74.14.147.245

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. --Orlady (talk) 04:12, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Green Party of Ontario. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. J (talk) 03:54, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Three revert rule violation block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Green Party of Ontario. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|I am trying to better the Green Party articles, i was given reasons such as "no sources" for undoing my edits even when I included many. I believe the user Greenjoe should be blocked from editing on the ground of vandalism for deleting parts of the Green Party of Ontario without valid reason, and really just standing in the way of trying to create a better article.}} below.

Sam Blacketer (talk) 15:05, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I am trying to better the Green Party articles, i was given reasons such as "no sources" for undoing my edits even when I included many. I believe the user Greenjoe should be blocked from editing on the ground of vandalism for deleting parts of the Green Party of Ontario without valid reason, and really just standing in the way of trying to create a better article."

Decline reason: "This does not excuse edit warring. Please see WP:3RR. — Yamla (talk) 21:21, 20 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] Green Party of Ontario

Fair enough. Here are my notes:

1. The paragraph that starts with "Elections Ontario records that in the 1999 provincial election," needs a better reference. The current one does not cut it.

2. The paragraph that starts with "The late 1960s is widely seen as the start of the global ecological movement," and the one following it need references.

3. Recent history needs references.

4. The part about the AGM is irrelevant. J (talk) 05:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Communist Party of Canada, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. NHRHS2010 talk 00:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] "Please"

Take a deep breath. You could use the talk page too. Instead of waiting for me to revert your edit, if you took the time to pre-emptively explain what you were doing, it would make it easier on both of us. You being logged in would also help so I know who you are. GJ (talk) 01:28, 18 December 2007 (UTC)