User talk:74.138.83.249

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to What the Bleep Do We Know!?, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. – Dreadstar † 22:14, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Columbia Pacific University. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Skinwalker 20:11, 20 August 2007 (UTC) The edits I have made are factual and contstructive. I am a graduate of CPU University (1983). As an Alumni and member of the Alumni Association, I noticed this wiki entry to be a heavily one sided attack on the University. The Alumni and Students of the University need a truthful representation of the facts. The entry contains irrelevant information about CCWU as it appears someone has a vandetta against Dr. Carr, which seems out of place and which I tried to put in a constructive context. However, most of the entries made about Diploma mills and unaccredited Universities and such are there for malicious reasons. If the thousands of of us that hold valud degrees from CPU or those who were faculty at CPU can't correct these smears, who can? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.138.83.249 (talk) 00:04, August 21, 2007 (UTC)

Please use the article talk page to seek consensus if you wish to make major changes to sourced material. Undescribed deletion of sourced material will be reverted as vandalism, and if you continue your account may be blocked. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 20:39, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 00:00, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Columbia Pacific University. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --ElKevbo 02:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure what I did wrong? But this wiki article on Columbia Pacific University contains many distortions. It really needs cleaning and it's clearly full of invalid or irrelevant information by someone hostile to CPU graduates. will do my best to learn and follow the wiki rules, thanks for your patience with me. 74.138.83.249 04:38, 21 August 2007 (UTC) Curt Hawley curthawley@curthawley.com

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 00:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC)