User talk:74.116.118.230

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This host, CPE0050180f97db-CM00195ed2403c.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com, is registered to Rogers Cable, McNicoll Primary Hub, an Internet service provider through which numerous individual users may connect to the Internet via proxy. This IP address may be reassigned to a different person when the current user disconnects.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, please contact unblock-en-l for assistance. If possible, please use an email address issued by your ISP or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Contents

[edit] Messages

Open source and free software are not the same thing. Changing links from one to the other is not helpful. Please stop it. GRBerry 20:24, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:3RR on Timothy F. Ball

Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy limiting each user to no more than 3 reverts (with a fairly broad definition of revert) per 24 hour period. See the details at WP:3RR. You have just reverted Timothy F. Ball for the 4th time. Please desist and argue your case on the talk page. Thanks.--Stephan Schulz 12:38, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule on Timothy F. Ball. In the future, please solve editing disputes through discussion rather than edit warring. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Heimstern Läufer (talk) 17:28, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Jeanne Kirkpatrick, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

It isn't NPOV to wipe out links to sourcewatch, but to leave behind ones to NewsMax and the American Enterprise Institute. I understand your position that sourcewatch may be biased, but it comes across as very disingenuous when you selectively purge links which happen to sit on only one side of the political fence. Poindexter Propellerhead 17:55, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Looking back over this address' history, I see about 35 edits like the above in the last day, and it's going to be a real PITA to revert them all. In the event of any more problems from this address, I would urge that it be indefinitely blocked. Poindexter Propellerhead 18:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

So instead of remove all biased link, you reinsert more biased link? Are you brain-dead or something?74.116.118.230 12:27, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Please adhere to Wikipedia's civility rules, even when you see statements you perceive as politically motivated and one-sided. -- THF 01:30, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to John Podhoretz. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Closenplay 04:30, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Richard Lindzen. As a member of the Wikipedia community, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information of living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article must include proper sources. Thank you. Kim D. Petersen 13:25, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Why the strange edits?

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]

Just curious for the motivation behind these edits. THF 21:09, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Still waiting for an answer. THF 22:20, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
With no answer forthcoming, the subject has been raised on WP:AN/I. THF 16:45, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jewish right, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. –Animum 23:10, 13 August 2007 (UTC)