Talk:7.62x45mm vz. 52

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 7.62x45mm vz. 52 article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.
	The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Firearms; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page where you can find a list of open tasks. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale
Additional information: This article has been marked as needing an image. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces (general topics): Military technology and engineering task force Weaponry task force

[edit] Dimensional Discrepancy

I tried to clean up the dimensional issue as best I could. I took the Howell book as best source, definitely more authoritative than Cartridge Corner, which while it lists sources at the end doesn't say what data came from which source. And I tried to list the conflicting info better in a subsection of the article. I may add a table instead of the current format, which is still confusing. Arthurrh 02:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

I did small update. Note ballistic performance data are from Cermak & Popelinsky (both sources the same data). About production date - probably not before 1952, and not after 1957, but I'm not sure if only 1952. hrd 2007-08-16