User talk:72.88.218.235

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This host, pool-72-88-218-235.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net, is registered to Verizon Internet Services Inc., Verizon FiOS in Newark, NJ., an Internet service provider through which numerous individual users may connect to the Internet via proxy. This IP address may be reassigned to a different person when the current user disconnects.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.


Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 72.88.218.235). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in.

When you edit pages:

  • Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
  • Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
  • If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
  • Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can click the edit this page tab above, type {{helpme}} in the edit box, and then click Save Page; an experienced Wikipedian will be around shortly to answer any questions you may have. Also feel free to ask a question on my talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy for editors, which you appear to have violated at Baruch Goldstein. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- Avi 01:11, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Category:Anti-Semitic people

Your recent edit to Category:Anti-Semitic people (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 20:21, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] April 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you to adhere to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy for editors, which it appears you have not followed at Digg. Thank you. - Mike Beckham 07:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning


Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Digg. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Czj 19:40, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice


This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to User:Ynhockey, you will be blocked from editing. MER-C 11:06, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning.

You trashed me on my talk page. See WP:AGF, WP:NPA, and WP:CIVIL. By the way, you removed an entire section from the article. By the way, I have made many useful contributions to Wikipedia. Cool BlueLight my Fire! 23:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

FYI, User:Cool Blue has reported you on WP:AIV. Amos Han Talk 00:30, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello. Are you someone that I know from school or something? Or what? I am not Israeli and I never reverted your changes. If you want to know who is the one that reverted your edit, then see the page history. Reply to me on your talk page. Amos Han Talk 10:22, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Want to know why you cannot vandalize your user page? It is because it is the property of Wikipedia. You rent the space. You have no means of ownership to it. Zurrr 20:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Apparently, you have the time to post trivial info on this page. It's not MY user page as I never regarded it as such. It is merely a page for the likes of you to masturbate to your own delusions of grandeur. My editing of this page is no different than your vandalism of it.

If you feel that this is the case, we welcome you to create an account and provide contructive,encyclopedic,sourced and reliable material. If you feel that articles are biased etc we welcome you to discuss the matter(s) in a constructive and civilised manner on the relavant talk pages. So far, your arguments have been childish and petty and making coments about "delusions of grandeur" only serve to make you look spiteful and jealous (esp of the privleges allowed for admins, as a philospher once said, "power wears away those that don't posses it), this kind of behaviour is not acceptable here. It seems to me that you have an axe to grind with wikipedia and if this is the case, there are plenty of websites that will cater for your kind of pointless drama and hostility. Best advice, if you don't like wikipedia, then don't read it. --Speed Air Man 12:44, 16 April 2007 (UTC)


Yes, let's talk about hostility, shall we? http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-322137076439356571&q=israeli+war+crimes&hl=en

I don't have an axe to grind, but I have a problem with the hypocrisy of Wikipedia and its bias. By the way, "comments .....only serve to make you look spiteful and jealous". Surely, you can do better than that. If you had an inkling of what goes on in the Middle East and understood its nuances and history well and then read through Wikipedia you would realize the folly of your statements. Alas, that's probably too much to ask from anyone on Wikipedia, an encyclopedia where majority opinion shapes reality.

  • Actually, I really couldn't care less what goes on in the middle east but I will suggest that instead of your pointless drama and hostility (because you can't get your own way on wikipedia) that you go and live in there and perhaps help the those "oppressed by zionism" first hand. However, it would seem that you don't quite have what it takes to deal with something that bothers you so strongly head on, ergo, you decide to go for an easy target to vent your frustration. Its easy to carp from the sidelines and be an internet warrior, far harder to actually take constructive action to effect change. Spiteful and jealous...quite spot on I thought, with your remarks you have made so far, also , I find it quite ammusing that cite wikipedia as a place "where majority opinon shapes reality", you could never accuse the pro-palestine movement of that, and the video you want us to see? you could just as easily accuse the makers of that video of being unreliable, biased and Anti-Israel. Finally, like I said earlier, if you don't like wikpedia, then don't read it. You have your own opinions about it, so it appears that you are only coming here to get upset in the first place. If not "spiteful and jealous" then I will say a case of learned behaviour i.e. you get offended by wikipedias supposed "Pro Israel" stance because you think you ought to. If you really want to have a pop at anyone for the problems in Israel, why not lobby the English? If it hadn't been for them interfering in things (circa 1920), maybe things would not be the way they are.....In my opinion of course.--Speed Air Man 23:29, 18 April 2007 (UTC)


You're clueless as usual and I didn't expect much from you. In fact, you have just validated my point. Thanks for helping in making my point. 2:26PM EDT

If you didn't expect much then why do you keep coming back? Also , exactly how have I validated your point? --Speed Air Man 19:35, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits

You are consistently uncivil to other editors and have repeatedly vandalized Israel-related pages to push your POV. Your actions are unacceptable. I will be monitoring your contributions to see if you continue to violate Wikipedia's policies. KazakhPol 19:48, 13 April 2007 (UTC)


I'm glad Wikipedia still has tools like you for moderators.

-Borat-

[edit] Warning

This is your only warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Antisemitism, you will be blocked from editing. -- Avi 18:24, 19 April 2007 (UTC)