User talk:72.88.182.184

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] 3RR warning at The relation between Islam and science

You have made three reverts at that page in the last 24 hours. If you make another you will be blocked. Please see WP:3RR. Arrow740 21:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] hello

take it easy on Islam and slavery. you should also consider getting an account. regards, ITAQALLAH 02:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

He already has an account.Proabivouac 05:30, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, 72.88.182.184, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV), and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! . Asteriontalk 23:52, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

first you gimme a warning then you gimme a welcome. That doesn't make sense. 72.88.182.184 23:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Undercover Mosque

The contents section is amply quoted in notable sources so please discuss any points you dispute before any further reverts . Thanks.--CltFn 04:39, 26 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Polite request and warning: please read carefully

Welcome to Wikipedia. I appreciate that you clearly have a depth of knowledge on a number of topics to which you are contributing. However, in an area where trying to reach consensus between people who have genuine and deep disagreements in standpoint you are editting aggressively: adding fairly large blocks of text, reverting other editors, making personal comments about other editors, possibly stalking other editors and in the case of Undercover Mosque you have reverted the same content into an article 3 times in 24 hours which is forbidden by WP:3RR. In normal circumstances a violation of WP:3RR would get your account blocked. Since you are a new editor and may not be familiar with how people should behave on Wikipedia, I am giving you a formal warning. Please leave this warning on your talk page for at least one week. I would really like you to use your evident knowledge to join the Wikipedia community, understand how people here discuss contraversial topics and become a valuable contributing editor. However, that requires you to modify how you are editting please. If you cannot manage to live by our rules sadly your contributions will be lost. --BozMo talk 10:00, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

ok but that rule says more than 3 times, not 3.
You are correct about the 3, and I apologise for that error. But please don't get into reverting as an editting tactic. Join in discussion and help make things better. Thanks --BozMo talk 13:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reverts

Sir, your incessant undiscussed reverts have become tiresome. Should you like to participate, by all means, join us in talkspace. I don't really care if you are a banned user as long as you conduct yourself reasonably, start discussing and stop edit-warring.Proabivouac 08:10, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

There's something weird about his IP, he's probably a banned user or some kind of sock. Arrow740 08:17, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

If you look at his first edits there is no doubt at all that we are dealing with a sock of some experienced (possibly banned) user. -- Karl Meier 21:38, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] No personal attacks

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -- Karl Meier 21:35, 31 January 2007 (UTC)