User talk:72.85.9.225

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Storm path templates

Just to let you know, I undid your additions to the 1900 through 1902 Atlantic hurricane season articles. You added dates in what appears to be a template form, but it doesn't comply with the storm path templates. Hurricanehink (talk) 18:21, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, you added the dates, but the way you added them means they showed up weird. If you want to add them, you can put the following into each storm section. {{infobox hurricane small | name= | category=storm | type=tropical storm | image= | formed= | dissipated= | highest winds= | lowest pressure= | hurricane season=1900 Atlantic hurricane season}}

You'll have to do some additions to each one - the name can be Tropical Storm One (unless there is an article, in which case it can have the article name). The Category is storm for tropical storms, but if it is a hurricane the category is whatever category the hurricane reached on the Saffir-Simpson scale; the type would also be changed to hurricane. Image is whatever the storm path location is. Formed and dissipated are in the format of September 1, 1900. Highest winds are whatever the peak winds were in mph (and km/h in parenthesis if you feel like it). Lastly the lowest pressure is whatever its lowest pressure (in mbar) was. If you don't want to do it, I understand, but I just wanted to bring this to your attention. Hurricanehink (talk) 19:11, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during April 28, 2008

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:38, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Khmer Rouge, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. yettie0711 (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Milk & Cheese. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. J.delanoygabsadds 20:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC)