User talk:72.75.5.121

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address (or network) has been used abusively.
This address (or network) has been blocked temporarily or permanently to prevent further abuse.

In extreme cases, an entire network may be blocked to prevent an abusive user from continually changing their IP address in order to evade blocks or abusing multiple accounts. If you are a registered user and are seeing this message, please follow these instructions.

Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed.

Hi,

Regarding this:

There is a difference between "indicted for war crimes" (as precise as it goes) and "war criminal" (brilliant example of your POV and croatiphobia). So, please stick to NPOV. --Ante Perkovic 22:41, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Boskovic

Cut the crap. If you have some proofs, list it at Boskovic page. --Ante Perkovic 11:05, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Personal attacks

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

Specifically, I'm referring to this one and edit summaries like those. May I remind you that civility is an official policy here? Duja 12:59, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Block

This is IP adress used by banned User:Purger aka User:Velebit exclusively. I'm blocking it. --Dijxtra 18:12, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

I agree 100%. I don't know if anyone other then "Purger" has access to internet over this IP, but it's obvious that noone except him didn't use it in the last 5 years. It is theoreticaly possible that many people will be blocked (cited user:Purger), but it is either not the case or we are blocking him and bunch of people that never edit wikipedia anyway. So, I really don't see the problem here. Good move, Dijxtra! --Ante Perkovic 05:22, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

P.S. - listing DNS stuff is sooooo typical for user:Purger after being blocked ;))). --Ante Perkovic 05:22, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Utter nonsense

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: " See the details below. The blocked IP address is a Verizon IS server address - which way many people will be blocked"

Decline reason: "If a large number of people were using this address, the contribution history would reflect that. It doesn't appear to, as I'm reading it. -- Luna Santin 07:22, 18 October 2006 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

WHOIS details removed. Already linked to at bottom

This block was endorsed by CheckUser Dmcdevit and should not be lifted prematurely without further checks by Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. --  Netsnipe  ►  10:14, 18 October 2006 (UTC)