User talk:72.72.202.222

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. CattleGirl talk | sign! 04:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Ok, sure. At least this shows that Wikipedia has a quality control. 72.72.202.222 05:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please stop vandalizing

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Tanaats 04:43, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Ok. I guess this proves wrong the notion that Wikipedia can be edited at random in any way by any one. I suppose that's good. 72.72.202.222 05:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] vr troopers

Well if you must make edits like this then you have to expect people to assume that other edits you make are nonsense/rubbish. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 02:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Those were quality control edits that involved reverting previous bad edits, and the quality control check turned out positive. Now I'm all about serious edits. Please be sure to read the selection before reverting, since you might end up reverting a good change to a garbage edit.
I think you need to read Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point especially the section titled "Hoaxes". Basically if you make vandalistic editst then how is anybody supposed to know that other edits you make are valid? CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 08:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Khukri - 13:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

So I guess the level 4im templates aren't meant to imply that they'll recieve the "wrath of God"?