User talk:72.69.213.21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Vandalism

Thank you for experimenting with the page Chichen Itza on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Sagaciousuk (talk) 00:25, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Ethiopia, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sagaciousuk (talk) 00:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit summaries

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Prodego talk 02:52, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Just to be clear, we're talking about this edit summary: "shut up, if you really want to edit, get an account jackass..." from this edit on 12/30/2006. Don't do it again. | Mr. Darcy talk 02:58, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] China Bid

Where are you finding that Continental Airlines wins the China bid? Without proof for such a topic, I must revert your edits.--Golich17 01:37, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Delta closing the CVG hub?

I'm going to have to revert your edits to Delta and CVG because I can find no source that Delta is actually closing the hubs. Please feel free to re-add these changes if you can produce a source. --Matt 20:29, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] BOS-NRT

Where are you hearing NW will fly BOS-NRT? NW has not released any such statement, nor have your "news wires". I have no choice but to revert your edits, unless you can find a legitimate citation saying otherwise. Neo16287 22:07, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Air France CDG-SLC

I can find no evidence anywhere that Air France is flying CDG to SLC direct. It seems that you have posted a number of things that no one can find evidence for - in the future, please provide sources or it might be considered vandalism. Thanks --Matt 00:07, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Alex Doonesbury

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 72.69.213.21! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 23:05, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Northwest DTW-ATH

Where did you find that NWA is planning a flight from Detroit to Athens? I couldn't find anything about this on NWA's website. I have removed your edit unless you can provide me a source for this route. Bucs2004 04:51, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Port Columbus International Airport

I can't find any evidence that Skybus has announced the routes you suggest. Please, cite your sources. Your edits appear to be vandalism without sources. --Matt 03:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport

Thank you for experimenting with the page Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Matt 18:51, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to IPCC Fourth Assessment Report

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Xnuala 02:47, 2 February 2007 (UTC), even though it was kinda funny

Please do not undo other people's edits repeatedly, or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the 3RR. Thank you. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 03:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for adding your humour to Wikipedia, but the articles are meant to be serious, so please don't make joke edits. Some readers looking for a serious article might not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write whatever you want (as long as it's not offensive). You might also want to check out Wikipedia:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 03:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Listen, if you're complaining about the current administration's attitude towards science (and, for that matter, civil rights), you're preaching to the choir. But the joke's getting old. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 03:20, 2 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] February 2007

The joke you're trying to introduce to The Super Bowl Shuffle is getting old, you know... Humour's great, but Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia. It is time to straighten up and make serious contributions. Otherwise, you might be blocked from editing Wikipedia. →AzaToth 04:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

If this is an shared IP address, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits.


[edit] Regarding edits made during February 4, 2007 (UTC) to Chicago Bears

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This joke is getting really old; it's time to stop now please. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Wikieditor06 04:19, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked again

You are blocked for a month this time. For the last weeks there's been nothing but vandalism from this IP, and your favorite global warming joke. Chick Bowen 04:21, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't know who this person is, whatever this person's doing is hurting me when I try to edit on Doonesbury. I have added numerous legit characters nobody has heard of in a long time and I'm a hardcore Doonesbury fan.

You'll have to register an account, then. We've just had too much vandalism from this account to allow it to continue. I do see that there are many good edits to Doonesbury articles as well. Chick Bowen 04:49, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Delta Airlines, you will be blocked from editing. NW036 21:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warning to other editors

This user is notorious for making things up, the edits might look sane, but there's absolutely nothing to back them up. --Matt 21:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Blocked yet again

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Natalie 22:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "For a short time, Natalie has failed describe how much time I'm will be blocked. I'm being blocked for an entire month and that's not a short time at all."

Decline reason: "A cursory glance at the editing history of this IP address shows persistent and long-term problems. Sorry. – Luna Santin (talk) 01:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.