User talk:72.240.155.123

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What some call vandalism, others call reality. Wikipedia's definition of nuetral applies only when a majority decides it. sorry, but you will only find convenient neutrality here. if enough people don't like it, it will be silenced. deleting this will only prove that I am speaking the truth. Go ahead and delete this rationalizing it away by saying my previous statement was only a flimsey even childish attempt to preserve my message, but you'd be wrong.

This page in a nutshell: I'm disappeared

one last thing, Are these "stupid edits", edits to my user page, because if so, why do you care?

The most overated basketball player to ever play the sport. He takes mediocrity to a whole new level.

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Mikki Moore. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Xiahou 00:41, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Mikki Moore, you will be blocked. Xiahou 00:42, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Greg Oden, you will be blocked. Xiahou 00:43, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Mikki Moore, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Xiahou 00:44, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Your repeated efforts to vandalize articles makes it seem that you are unaware that Wikipedia is a serious project. You have been reported to the administration group for continuing vandalism and an administrator will review your contributions shortly. You may not receive another warning before being blocked, so be careful and be serious from now on. If you are blocked, please reconsider your behavior once the block expires.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated.-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 00:59, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Regarding edits made during February 8, 2007 (UTC) to Paul Pierce

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 02:09, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Don't stop! If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Charlie Weis, you will be Treated like a king foR improving Wikipedia. Citicat 02:19, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to User:Citicat, you will be blocked from editing. GracenotesT § 02:24, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

You're forgiven, as long as you resolve to edit constructively. Be bold and try to improve articles! Get an account, and check out the Wikipedia's intro! You can turn over a new leaf. If you choose to continue to vandalize, however, you will be blocked. It's your choice. GracenotesT § 02:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. alphachimp 02:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

You keep putting "Remember me (with a colorful word)" on my userpage and yourself or others undo it. The funny thing is...no I don't remember you. Vandals are forgetful, truly their antics are not worth remembering. You need to understand that wiki has a history of everything done and it one click it can all be revereted. So your persistant vandalism of my page isn't even a blip on the radar. Its fixed before I even see it. So you continually get warned and blocked for your destructive vandalism that is very EASILY fixed, and serves no purpose whatsoever. While I continue to read and enjoy wiki for all its merrits correcting the mistakes of vandals. Remember you? Don't even know who you are to care. You could easily quit be a vandal be constructive and actually be helpful on wikipedia. Previous records of actions can be changed. Otherwise its just ievitable that a permablock will come, eventually. So do us all a favor. Do the editors a favor, be helpful, be constructive. If you don't have anything to add or help just read it. --Xiahou 15:42, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Nishkid64 00:41, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Feb 22 07 edits

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:72.240.155.123 , you will be blocked. Xiahou 00:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] reply to your comment

I thought there was nothing noteworthy about Those who you call "Vandals", but you keep watching me. 72.240.155.123 00:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

its called a watch list everytime you (me) edits something. The next time its highlight if any changes. I did an RC search for any recent IP only edits of user talk pages. Any removing characters are usually vandals removing their warnings. And low and behold there yours was highlighted do to the fact I had edited you page in the past. Reguardless, you could learn something and realized that wiki is a serious project and vandals won't be tolerated. Vandalism is quickly reverted. It doesn't solve or accomplish anything. So please be a good editor make good edits or just read wiki you don't have to edit.

also in reply to your edit summary your paragraph is fine. Its the chaning of the warnings that got it reverted. You putting in back into place is fine. Its part of the process --Xiahou 00:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

wiki is a joke of a project. Period, end of story. They can take it as seriously as they want, but in the end it's merely a silly website that the Purifiers will cleanse.

You can think that, and thats fine, but why don't you do us all a favor, and stop making stupid edits that are not productive to anyone. I don't really care if you think that Wikipedia is a joke of a project, but there are people that do try to make it better, and people like you are what make it a joke of a project. Try Wikipedia out, you might actually like it once you stop vandalizing. Oh, yes, I'm thinking of reporting you to an administrator and recommending indefinate (forever) blocking, due to your vandalism over the past month, and you not getting the point that you can't vandalize Wikipedia. Chickyfuzz14(user talk) 03:39, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

one last thing, Are these "stupid edits", edits to my user page, because if so, why do you care? Random typing to get you attention sdfsdgdfasdf asdf asdf asdf asdfasfdesudesuasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdf

answer me that, and you won't here a peep from me. I'm awaiting a response.

Umm...no, those stupid edits are not to your userpage. These are the stupid edits that I am talking about: [1], [2], [3]. Would You like me to get more for you? Chickyfuzz14(user talk) 04:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

2 should have been in the sandbox, but i didn't think of it at the time, hang on, the rooster one is real, my grandfater had chickens on his farm, and that's what you do. and with that, This is P.H.H. signing off.

Wow, I feel sorry for you, after checking your userpage I know see why you're so naive. once you experience more of life, you'll understand. I remember being that stupid when I was young as well. I wish you health hapiness and a long life. Fare thee well. And that ladies and gentlemen, is my final signoff. Goodnight.

Act like your the best person in the world, see where it will get you. I might be naive, but at least im not self centered and rude. and: due to your recent edits:
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Chickyfuzz14(user talk) 04:43, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] actually...

I actually didn't delete/change any of the warnings, but I used the template for one. 72.240.155.123 00:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Kansas has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 04:28, 24 March 2007 (UTC)