User talk:72.196.233.224

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Brattleboro, Vermont for inappropriate discussion, as described here, you may be blocked. Also at Talk:Barack Obama Grsz 11 15:09, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Brattleboro, Vermont for inappropriate discussions you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Schcambo (talk) 16:37, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia is a fascist experiment and I fully expect the left-wing mafia who runs this site to promptly prevent me from writing anything here for I am guilty of the crime of speaking the truth. Expect to see this statement deleted. What fascists everywhere never realize is that the harder they crack down, the more obvious their corruption becomes. 11:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
For what it's worth, fascism is actually a right-wing position. And the problem isn't that you are "guilty of the crime of speaking the truth," but rather that you are guilty of speaking that "truth" on article talk pages that are not your organs for free speech. Consider perusing the policies and guidelines, making a user account and then contributing properly. The great strength of Wikipedia is the huge number or editors - they keep each other in check. -- Scjessey (talk) 11:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Indeed, the editors here do keep others in check. The cabal of left wing editors here brook no dissension from those who see things differently. 72.196.233.224 (talk) 09:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

72.196.233.224|72.196.233.224, your comments appear to be controversial, if you are make such claims, you should provide cite credible sources You can cite news stories by adding single brackets around the news story, for more ifo go here [1], Views held be a particular church, in my view, would be more appropriate on the wiki article about the church, if one should exist. His support of gun restrictions, and comparing his position on gun control to that of the Nazis, could be against wiki Neutral Point of View policies (NPOV), unless you could find credible 3 part sources to support you claim. The best thing to do is always provide reference to claims made on wiki, my general way of handling this is: if I put something on a wiki article (even a birthday, name of child, place of birth), I always try to cite a source. If I cite something, which I feel could be taking as controversial, I try to back it up with at least 4 national or international sources. An the way I to cite a reference is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Cite_sources/archive1. Hope this help, but I do strongly encourage you to actively provide references, it cab strenghthen you case when presenting information. Also, I encourage you to create your own wiki account, so you can become more involved in make wikipedia better. It is me i think (talk) 14:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Barack Obama for inappropriate discussions you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Grsz11 14:50, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


Please don't make such stupid statement, like you did here. Grsz11 14:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The 'new consensus' being claimed

Please state on the Talk page of the Barack Obama article whether you Support or Oppose Scjessey's version.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barack_Obama#Let.27s_see_whether_you_really_have_a_.22new_consensus.22_.28version_2.29 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kossack4Truth (talk • contribs) 02:19, 26 May 2008 (UTC)