User talk:72.192.94.145

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

<div style="float: <left>; text-align: center; width: 150px; border: 2px solid green; background-color:#f7f8ff; padding: 5px; font-size: 95%"> Vandalism information


RULES: No formal, no cussing, no boredom, no fighting, no insulting, no saying I vandalized making the page better. No removing these rules, they're saved on my computer anyway. Got it?

Thank you for experimenting with the page Child on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. GhostPirate 18:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] re Child

Cut it out, it's not even funny. I've blocked you for a while, hoping that when you come back you'll be willing to contribute constructively. Herostratus 04:23, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Child, you will be blocked. -- Flyguy649 05:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)


Blocked for a week. Academic Challenger 05:27, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Nope, no editing age. You are free to edit almost any page without logging in.

[edit] Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users, and you will be able to:

Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, remember to sign and date your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

I have an account.


[edit] May 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Silly Songs with Larry, you will be blocked from editing. Mini-Geek (talk) 16:54, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I added a small detail. Did I accidentally add a spoiler?
If I could comment here (albeit a little late), what this IP address added to the article I wouldn't consider vandalism, as it is a factual (if perhaps poorly-worded) description of what happens in that particular episode. It sounds like vandalism, but that's probably why they call them "Silly Songs". ;) Danthemankhan 15:56, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Katieh5584 20:37, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Put it back! We use $! Not that pound sign.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Boredom, you will be blocked from editing. Cheers, Lights 03:25, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Boredom. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Corpx 03:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Boredom, you will be blocked from editing. Trusilver 03:38, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] You have been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 week as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. If you wish to contest this block, please do so by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on your page, and somebody will come by shortly to review this action. ~ Riana ⁂ 03:41, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I added cool awesome to stiff wikipedia. Yawn. Next? Anything important?"

Decline reason: "Not blocked directly, please follow the instructions from a signed-in account. — Yamla 23:13, 25 July 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 22:28, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Yo!

Whadda Heck? "A Child is nine n unda" is dead wrong! N yo, njoy ur childhood. I njoyin' mine. A child is 20 n unda, thatz da legal age. So u in 6 grade n u dont consida ur self a child. What wrong w/ u? U mad young. I gonna consida myself a child untill i actually not. U can do whaddeva u want, But ur still a child, not my problem. But let me tell u somin', once u bcome an adult, life will stink. So i suggest that u just njoy ur childhood, yo. Peace! --Mr. Comedian 21:38, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Mongo no know what unfunny say. Mongo only pawn in game of life.
This is how all posts in here shall be. Wonderfully, perfectly, and utterly informal.

[edit] March 2008

Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Wizards of Waverly Place. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. Use either last or full names in articles, never first only NrDg 04:52, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Precisely why I added that last syllables to David.

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive or hard to read formatting, as you did in Wizards of Waverly Place, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stay with wiki standards on wiki NrDg 04:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm trying to do first and last names. :p
HARD TO READ? No. If you talk like this at school, I'd find it hard to decipher.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Wizards of Waverly Place. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. NrDg 05:22, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Well tell Eew-ing to cut it out!
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. NrDg 05:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I tried to undo my own edit at that! No fair!"

Decline reason: "You had already reverted 5 times before the 3RR warning.— NrDg 05:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Which rests in your responsibility to warn me!"

Decline reason: "The warning is a courtesy. You gave no indication of stopping the revert war thus the block. Please consider what you want to accomplish in the article and work with other editors. Attempting to force an outcome, especially one that goes against Wiki standards is disruptive editing. — NrDg 05:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.