User talk:72.192.18.169

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your recent edit to Haditha killings (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 02:10, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Survivor: China

Please do not add in tribe names or filming dates unless you can provide a cited reliable source for the names and dates. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo 18:30, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Television Without Pity has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Majorly (talk) 19:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Big Brother 9 (U.S.), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. This also applies to Template:Big Brother US. The ninth season of Big Brother US is being refered to as Big Brother 9 by the broadcaster, reporters, etc. Only the logo has a heart. This is similar to the seventh season) which was refered to as the All Stars season but not a star. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 21:14, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Amanda Kimmel (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Survivor: China. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. The Helpful One 18:43, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Survivor 17 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Razorflame Report false positives 03:50, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Survivor 17 and 18

vandalism.. you're acting Like a DOG!!

[edit] New tables on Survivor: Micronesia and Survivor: China

About the two tables that you added to the articles, I and another editor have the opinion that the new tables are unnecessary as it brings excessive detail and clutter to the page. I appreciate the work you put into creating the tables, but can you please discuss why you believe the tables are a good addition on the respective talk pages before you reinsert them again? Thanks. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:13, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

I think they serve as an easy to read visual organizer to how how well each contestant did in the challenges. It's basically the "Challenge Tracker" that used to appear on the CBS website but is now discontinued. Plus it provides more detailed placements for each competition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.192.18.169 (talk • contribs)

I understand that, but the placement of the castaways in individual challenges very rarely make any difference on the outcome of the challenge or the game. It's usually a winner takes all thing. Anyways, if you could start a new thread about the issue on Talk:Survivor: Micronesia and Talk:Survivor: China, we can see if we can get a consensus on whether the tables should be added and, if so, any changes could be made to simplify them. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:30, 29 May 2008 (UTC)