User talk:72.155.113.55

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Your tennis edits

(This anonymous user is doing the same disruptive edits as User talk:72.155.122.103 - probably same person.)

Please discuss at the relevant talk pages any major changes in the format of presenting player results. What you have been doing, without (as I can see) any prior discussion can be viewed as disruptive. Best regards, --HJ 01:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC)


I see you continue your edits without any discussion. It is now becoming an unpleasant pattern. Please stop, and take a look at WP:3RR. --HJ 01:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
And you continued further under user names that were immediately blocked (they were impersonations of one editor who, like me and others, do not agree with your self-invented score format for tennis players) Examples: Tennis_Xpert and Tennis_Xspert (while possible still maintaining this alias Tennis Genius). PLEASE be constructive instead of disruptive!--HJ 07:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

And you continue today. Why not stop and be constructive? --HJ 17:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] This page

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you will be blocked for vandalism. Dar-Ape 18:47, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] This page

These comments were not left here to annoy you; they were left because we think your behavior needs improvement. You may archive them if you wish, but if you continue to blank this page minutes after these warnings are left, you will be blocked for vandalism. Dar-Ape 19:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

I will archive your talk page for you, but in a day or two; it is not good to archive current/ongoing discussions. Do you have a preference as to which type of archive you'd like? Also, please remember to sign your comments with ~~~~. Thanks, Dar-Ape 19:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

Please stop. If you continue to delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Pete Sampras, you will be blocked. Prolog 19:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. IrishGuy talk 19:28, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pete Sampras

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 3 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so may be considered disruptive. Owen× ☎ 19:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Dar-Ape 19:35, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:3RR violation block

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 19:45, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I was not vandalising anybody just switching the score format why should I be suspended for a three rules violation if the other guy doing his version of the score format was not suspended. please bring me back ASAP"

Decline reason: "Very clear 3rr; comments like "YOU CANNOT WIN AHAHAH" indicate you intentionally ignored multiple warnings. Kuru talk 21:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] February 26

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Onorem 14:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Onorem 14:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

You are making format changes that are obviously against consensus, and you are removing information in the process. (Michael Chang being the youngest grand slam winner.) Edit warring against obvious consensus is vandalism. Stop and take it to the talk pages. --Onorem 14:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

However the format changes are the CORRECT ONES and I think you should do some research.

You've used Tennis Master (talk · contribs), a few different IP's, and a couple sockpuppets to impersonate Tennis expert (talk · contribs).
9 people have come to this talk page in the last 2 days because they disagree that your format changes are the CORRECT ONES. The consensus seems to be that your changes are not the CORRECT ONES, so take it to the talk pages before making changes that it would appear everyone but you disagree with. If they disagree with you there, you could try taking it to Wikipedia:Resolving disputes. What you shouldn't do is continuously ignore multiple other editor's opinions and take it upon yourself to make changes that it seems nobody else agrees with. --Onorem 14:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
This is your only warning. Such vandalism that you have done will not be tolerated,and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia next time.

--Cometstyles 15:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked for persistent disruption of tennis-related articles for a period of fifty hours. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. -- tariqabjotu 15:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I was only updateing score formats and i wish to come back ASAP thank you"

Decline reason: "No evidence your behaviour changed AT ALL since your previous block. — Yamla 17:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.