User talk:72.139.17.252

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Hello 72.139.17.252, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. One small note, please do not use incivility in your edit summaries, as it may be taken as an attack. Happy editing! -- Dhartung | Talk 06:59, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "abusive admin"

Decline reason: "Continued incivility. — Yamla 19:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "abusive admin"

Decline reason: "If you hardly ever use the site, then the one month block shouldn't be much of an inconvenience. Continuing to be incivil and attacking other editors isn't the best way to get unblocked. Denied. — IrishGuy talk 19:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.


So he blocked me. I'm not frustrated, but I'm offended, as one is. The page about blocks says that blocks are meant to protect wikipedia, and I don't see how this does that, since it occurred days after my last edit, and I hardly ever use the site. It's not a meaningful punishment, either. I was going to fix some amusing stupidity, but I guess I'll leave it here for someone else to enjoy.

As for DragonflySixtyseven, he's not very nice, and has indefinitely blocked scores of people in the last month for apparently minor things. I just wanted to mention that to someone.

I don't really hate wikipedia. I only hate the ignorant and stupid contributors and the incompetent hypocrites who moderate it.

[edit] Your edits to Talk:St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine

With regards to your comments on Talk:St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Leuko 21:41, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] No personal attacks

It's OK to have grievances against Wikipedia or other users, but edits like this one constitute a personal attack. Personal attacks are not permitted on Wikipedia and you will be blocked if you continue to make them. Please be civil in your criticisms. —dgiestc 20:31, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Jan Lorenc, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 22:23, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Night Attack, you will be blocked from editing. Sir James Paul 04:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "more abusive, ignorant trash"

Decline reason: "It looks like several people have asked you to consider calming down the tone of your insults, and you've chosen to ignore polite requests and warnings, alike. Please understand that insults of that nature can be damaging to the community, particularly when the behavior is persistent. If you'd care to discuss this, or commit to change your behavior, I might be more comfortable removing or reducing the block, but at this time, I don't believe I should. Apologies. – Luna Santin (talk) 02:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.