User talk:72.1.222.140

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 72.1.222.140, is registered to Telecom Ottawa Limited, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 06:06, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Simpsons

In response to your question on my talk page, you've run into a situation that is affecting a lot of articles on TV episodes. There's a faction on Wikipedia that just doesn't want them, so they've pretty much made it that unless a book or journal article has been written about a particular episode, it's hard to put one together that satisfies people and yeah, that's tough for an episode just broadcast, though at least in the Simpsons case we know there will be another Simpsons Forever book eventually. You've also run into an additional problem at Wikipedia. For all of its claims to being "an encyclopedia anyone can edit" the truth is registered editors are predisposed to be harder on edits made by people who are not registered. I know I always assume such edits to be vandalism and on a few occasions where I have forgotten to log in and have made an edit, I've had good faith material removed because of me being an IP. I would strongly advise you register an account. Also, you have to remember to sign your posts using 4 tildes ~~~~ otherwise this, too, upsets people. Looking at the discussion it appears somone found an acceptable source for the information. 23skidoo (talk) 14:56, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps you would have a better time at The Simpsons Wiki, I can assure you that such things as what you added would be most welcome. -- Scorpion0422 15:41, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Frederic H Dustin‎

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags, instead type {{hangon}}. You will also need sources to verify the information you are providing. Ctjf83Talk 04:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Well as long as you have reliable sources Ctjf83Talk 05:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Frederic H Dustin

We do not vote on Wikipedia. The fact that numerically there were more keep comments does not mean it will not be deleted. The keep comment by you did not address the notability concerns; it merely accused the nomination of systemic bias. Jejujejujeju is an SPA who has only edited that article. The next one said only keep, which is a useless comment. The next one was weak. There were significant concerns about notability, and only one or two of the keep comments said they viewed them as enough, and those were weak. After reviewing the article, two of the links lead nowhere (for me, at least). The jeju article was the only one that could have indicated notability; however, I agreed with those who supported deletion that it was not sufficient for an article. seresin | wasn't he just...? 17:43, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:40, 15 March 2008 (UTC)