User talk:72.1.195.4/Archive01
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an archive. Please leave messages at User talk:72.1.195.4. Thanks.
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Academic Challenger 21:05, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Johnleemk | Talk 15:30, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Raymond Samuels, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fightindaman 23:48, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Do not blank half a page. I'm surprised your not blocked yet, but LAST WARNING. Whopper 18:28, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] May 2006
Thank you for experimenting with the page List of billionaires on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Grafikm_fr (AutoGRAF) 18:59, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to J. Philippe Rushton, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. hoopydinkConas tá tú? 16:41, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Rushton
Hey, thanks for helping with the Rushton article - looks like you got pinged by someone for vandalism by accident - you should probably do yourself a favor and create an account so you won't get hit like that. --JereKrischel 16:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks again for your edits to the Rushton article. I would appreciate it if you would focus on the changes you intend to make, and avoid reverting entire sections with out-dated versions because of one dispute. I know together we can make this article well-balanced and NPOV, but it will take longer if we don't try to work with eachother! Please let me know either on my talk page, or on the Rushton talk page, if there are particular sections you have issues with, and we can work together to draft something appropriate. --JereKrischel 18:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Looks like we've still got more back and forth to do on the Rushton article - thank you for your patience! Again, I suggest that you create yourself an account rather than just go by your IP address.
-
- A couple of notes:
-
- 1) I think our "faulty syllogisms" probably should be deleted - neither represents what the other side intends - but if you'd like to keep them I understand.;
-
- 2) On genetic differences PC analysis forming clusters does not directly speak to absolute genetic similarity/difference. Red herring, got removed.
-
- 3) Moved the professional opinion down to the appropriate section;
-
- 4) We need to simplify the description of his theory - rewriting his book in the section doesn't really provide what we should be trying to provide as an encylopedia - a concise overview. Are there specific bits that you feel are must have, that I've pruned? Maybe we can add them in one at a time?
-
- Thanks again for your help, please let me know on my talk page, or on the talk page for the Rushton article if you have more concerns! --JereKrischel 17:06, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your edit to World Wrestling Entertainment
Your recent edit to World Wrestling Entertainment (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 19:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning for editing Glenn Beck (diff). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // AntiVandalBot 19:13, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Misza13 19:16, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] February 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Cell (biology), you will be blocked. Figma 20:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] September 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. It appears you have not followed this policy at Michael Coren. Please always observe our core policies. Thank you. delldot talk 15:30, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
[edit] Michael Coren
Read Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. You can't add unsourced material that attacks a person. If you re-add the material without a source you will be blocked. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- It's no good putiing the sources on my talk page. The sources must be in the article. Look at this wher I removed the material. There were no sources in the material that you added and in fact some of it looks like opinion. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 18:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)