User talk:71.79.37.118

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Edits to Church of the Nazarene

Would you be willing to discuss your edits to the Church of the Nazarene article? You reverted a lot of good information. If you have issues with anything said in the article, it would be good to mention it on the talk page so that we can reach consensus about it. —Cswrye 18:03, 4 November 2006 (UTC) .

Sorry about that. I did realize that some information I had updated was removed by 198.60.208.219 back in September. I did not mean to remove updated data. Changing it back now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.79.37.118 (talk • contribs)

Yes, I got the message. I did removed the section titled "Legal Corner" since it was empty except for an external link. It didn't seem appropriate for an encyclopedia, so if you want it back, I recommend adding some content to it to make it more apparent what the purpose of the section is supposed to be. —Cswrye 19:48, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

I haven't vandalized anything. YOU HAVE. You are the one removing clearly permissible edits simply because you are obsessed with homosexuality. Now, if you can input your information in accordance with the Wikiproject guidelines, which are very clear, then fine. But, until you learn them, I will revert EVERY EDIT that you make. See. I'm not afraid to sign my name to my actions. But, it seems you are a coward (like most Nazarenes). Mphamilton 18:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

If you have such a strong belief, 71.70.37.118, in the Nazarene's statements on human sexuality, then DO THE RESEARCH, provide a link/reference, and an EXACT date. "Sometime between 2004 and 2006" is lazy and unacceptable. I have reverted your changes yet again. Mphamilton 20:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Please use talk pages, Mr. (or Mrs.) "71.79.37.118." Simply making edits back and forth accomplishes little. Mphamilton appears to have an excellent grasp of what Wikipedia is meant to be, and we all need to work together to produce a good result.--Grinik 03:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] An accusation against User:MPHamilton

[edit] Posted by user User talk:71.79.37.118

"Below is a message from mphamilton. this type of bully behavior is completely unacceptable and should not be tolerated. mphamilton, you are the one who is violating the wikiproject guidelines. i simply was trying to revert back to updated information, and may have done it the wrong way, but it has since been corrected. you, on the other hand have reverted my posts to point of vandalism. please stop. thank you.

[edit] Vandalism I haven't vandalized anything. YOU HAVE. You are the one removing clearly permissible edits simply because you are obsessed with homosexuality. Now, if you can input your information in accordance with the Wikiproject guidelines, which are very clear, then fine. But, until you learn them, I will revert EVERY EDIT that you make. See. I'm not afraid to sign my name to my actions. But, it seems you are a coward (like most Nazarenes). Mphamilton 18:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

If you have such a strong belief, 71.70.37.118, in the Nazarene's statements on human sexuality, then DO THE RESEARCH, provide a link/reference, and an EXACT date. "Sometime between 2004 and 2006" is lazy and unacceptable. I have reverted your changes yet again. Mphamilton 20:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)"

[edit] My defense

In my defense, the above ANONYMOUS user has consistently made major changes to the Church of the Nazarene article while giving no consideration to weeks or even months of edits by others. The anonymous user has become so obsessed with the Church of the Nazarene's position on homosexuality that he/she blatantly ignores the unbiased edits of others. Personally, I made no changes to the sections originally authored by the anonymous user until the last two days. My participation, involvement, and action with the Church of the Nazarene article has been exemplary until this point. As a former Nazarene, I wanted to make sure that the article was presented in line with the Wikipedia NPOV policy. The anonymous user did not consider the NPOV policy. I encourage any reader to browse the various and even extensive edits I have made to the Church of the Nazarene article to examine my claims. Mphamilton 03:20, 20 March 2007 (UTC)