User talk:71.42.142.238

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] On being polite (and helpful)

"You're the pot calling the kettle black" is not politeness. Consider yourself warned. --Alvestrand 19:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Uh...actually, I find that to be a very neutral statement -- in fact, it is saying that both sides of the argument are equivalent. You're reading something into it that isn't there. Consider yourself advised. --71.42.142.238 20:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
P.S. I have in fact helped out the person you claim that I'm not being polite to (via supporting their edit AND providing the citation that they did not take the trouble to dig up), so your statement above is just that much more bizarre to me. I see that you're not a native speaker of English...there may be a gap in understanding here due to translation. --71.42.142.238 20:03, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop threatening me and calling me a vandal. I saw the editors response to the conflict he saw it was about content not vandalism. Unity is not the only source for references a neutral third part is valid source, which you remove with out discussion since it did not agree with your view point. You sound more like a born again then New Thought. Peace and love.151.202.182.100 04:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

I've warned you...only once. And that's all the warning you'll receive. --71.42.142.238 14:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Hey Scottandrewhutchins and or 71.42.142.238 for what its worth ( I wll try not to mispell anything for you) you win. Allowing others- a third party view is part of the process. It is not either or, but both. To realize and honor Unity's roots in both is my objective. Not to diminish but to enhance the belief systems. New Thought Unity , Religious Science. Divine Science are meant to added on to, (New Thoughts) to continue to grow and expand just like our Minds. Thanks.JGG59 15:05, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

I am not Scottandrewhutchins. Suggest you refer your communications to his talk page. --71.42.142.238 15:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
This is also for you 71,42.142.238. ThanksJGG59 15:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

I amended my words not yours. The message was for the two of you. I did not change the content of message. Take care.JGG59 19:40, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

That's simply dishonest, JGG59. You modified my message to Scott...period. Don't do it again.--71.42.142.238 19:53, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Please leave me alone you have the article the way you want. I might not know all the rules on Wiki. But at least I know how to treat people and not talk down to them. You are one person I would hope never to hear from again. You must be a bundle of JOY.Hoping this is last contact.JGG59 20:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

There is only one force, and one power in the universe, JGG59...and it includes me. You don't quite believe what you know, do you? Would suggest you check out the Church of Euthanasia. Not that I think you'll fit in (one would hope), but your new buddy's partner has a position there. Catherineyronwode is an interesting character, I'll give you that much. --71.42.142.238 13:39, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nav Box

Do you know how the Christianity box works? Click on the word "show" to the right of Western Christianity. Western Catholicism is the first entry. BTW, I am the last person who would show any bias for or against the Roman Catholic Church as I am in no way, shape, or form a member of that body. -- SECisek (talk) 16:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm disengaging from this, but thanks for the navigational lesson. --71.42.142.238 (talk) 16:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)