User talk:71.34.20.31

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] February 2007

Instead of removing the template everywhere, you might instead want to discuss your problems with the template here: Template talk:LGBT ~a (user • talk • contribs) 07:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

I never said you weren't being helpful or constructive. I said you should discuss your problems here: Template talk:LGBT. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 08:24, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BJ^Talk 08:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Greetings. Instead of removing the template unilaterally, it would be better to discuss changes on the talk page. Justin Eiler 08:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. BJ^Talk 08:04, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Removing talk page headers without discussion or consensus is not helpful nor constructive. BJ^Talk 08:15, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Then it seems you are out numbered, if you want to get something done this is not the way to do it. BJ^Talk 08:23, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Being outnumbered isn't the issue. Being outnumbered doesn't mean he is incorrect. However, he should discuss radical changes like this one on the template talk pages (or article talk pages). ~a (user • talk • contribs) 08:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

If you continue to remove WikiProject templates without first establishing consensus, I will block you from editing without further warning. If you have legitimate issues, I encourage you to voice them in the appropriate forums, such as the admin noticeboard, community noticeboard, or village pump (your currently chosen forum appears to be the home turf of the very group you're opposing, so a more general one may get a more general hearing) -- as it currently stands, you seem to have disrupted a number of articles without convincing anyone that this disruption is required or wise. Please develop consensus before continuing down such a controversial path. I'd rather not be too confrontational about this, but I do feel a need to impress you with the gravity of this warning; please reconsider your methods. Thank you. – Luna Santin (talk) 09:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

---

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]