User talk:71.252.153.26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Spamming of http://www.en.csharp-online.net

en.csharp-online.net

Spam sock accounts

71.252.153.26 (talkcontribsdeleted contribsWHOISRDNStraceRBLshttpblock userblock log)
71.244.44.67 (talkcontribsdeleted contribsWHOISRDNStraceRBLshttpblock userblock log)
71.244.44.123 (talkcontribsdeleted contribsWHOISRDNStraceRBLshttpblock userblock log)
CSharp-Online.NET Editor (talkcontribsdeleted contribsWHOISEditor&submit=Resolve RDNStraceEditor.html RBLsEditor/ httpblock userblock log)
71.252.197.197 (talkcontribsdeleted contribsWHOISRDNStraceRBLshttpblock userblock log)
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. You are, however, encouraged to add appropriate content to the encyclopedia. If you feel the material in question should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Hu12 18:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.--Hu12 19:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)