User talk:71.232.157.145

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Your edits

Your edits to William Connolley ([1]) are being reverted by multiple users. In order for a fact to be notable, it generally has to be covered by a reliable source, not just a disgruntled anonymous editor. Please stop inserting your edit. If you'd like to discuss this further, consider using the article talk page. MastCell Talk 04:43, 18 October 2007 (UTC)


Just to advise I'll be seeking an immediate and permanent block if you repeat edits of this kind.JQ 06:52, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeatedly inserting unsourced negative material into a biography of a living person, and appearing to harass a Wikipedia editor/article subject. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Matt Frewer, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Matt Frewer was changed by 71.232.157.145 (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-12-21T03:00:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Bill Hicks, you will be blocked from editing. --Michig (talk) 22:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming, you will be blocked from editing. Brusegadi (talk) 02:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Blocked again

You have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.
I didn't vandalize that page. --71.232.157.145 (talk) 14:40, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
71.232.157.145, This is an old block that was imposed on the 17th of January, You may not have made those edits, because sometimes Ip's are recycled by Internet Service Providers which can mean that you could get an Ip address that someone else had used to vandalize Wikipedia. Thanks,Mifter (talk) 14:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
OK, I apologize for overreacting then.--71.232.157.145 (talk) 14:46, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] New Message from Mifter

Hello, 71.232.157.145. You have new messages at Mifter's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} template.

[edit] Edits

Please do not make unusual comments or criticize articles such as you did to liberal elite, and do not remove templates or other materials from Wikipedia. thank you for your cooperation. Buddha24 (talk) 11:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia is such a joke, only certainly political material is allowed, all other material is censored. Stop acting like a fool.--71.232.157.145 (talk) 03:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

You are incorrect, the allegations that you claim are false and inaccurate. Please refrain from making any more unconstructive edits, and you shall be rewarded. Buddha24 (talk) 06:37, 13 May 2008 (UTC)