User talk:71.19.20.202

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  1. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --lightdarkness (talk) 19:45, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. No Guru 20:30, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] June 06

One or more links you recently added to Wikipedia have been removed. Please familliarise yourself with WP:EL and WP:Spam before adding any more. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. -- Steel 22:20, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The open door

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Childzy talk contribs 06:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


Stop removing the footnote of the "The Open Door" article, this is classed as vandalism and if you continue to remove it you will be blocked from editing wikipedia. --Childzy talk contribs 17:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Childzy talk contribs 20:39, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Why did you do it again???? thats around five times you have blanked the page, you have now been reported to an admin. --Childzy talk contribs 07:52, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Read Talk:The Open Door! And I wrote on the edit page 'do not remove this notice', and you just went ahead and did it! TWICE! You are the only person who seems to be in favour of removing the note, and several people see its use - you are outnumbered! I hope the admins see fit to block you. U-Mos 12:34, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. Pilotguy (roger that) 13:42, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reliable sources

I highly suggest you read Wikipedia's policy on reliable sources. Any information that does not have a cited source is subject to removal. It's definitely not a bad idea to actually create an account also. Roguegeek (talk) 21:12, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] EvThreads.com

Hello,

I've done some research on the status of EvThreads.com, and what I've found is located at Talk:Evanescence#EvThreads.com. Please feel free to contribute any additional information that I might have missed, and please do not make further edits to the EvThreads.com link in the Evanescence article until this issue has been discussed on the talk page linked above. Thanks! —Lantoka ( talk | contrib) 21:51, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ben Moody

I've removed the abuse section again. Biographical information about people must meet WP:BLP standards. The sources given do not support the conclusion that Moody was emotionally and physically abusive. exolon 20:01, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

  • The same applies to Amy Lee and Evanescence. We MUST have credible sources for this sort of information. This is non-negotiable on Wikipedia. exolon 20:06, 4 November 2006 (UTC)