User talk:71.185.131.11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Because Wikipedia is shit"


Decline reason: "How very convincing. – Luna Santin (talk) 01:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I am Jimbo Wales and I am at my gay partner's house but his kid vandalizes. If you unblock me I'll make you chairman of my next WikiProject."


Decline reason: "Serious requests only, please. – Luna Santin (talk) 01:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Third time's a charm, especially if you're a faggot who calls himself Ybbor the chink."


Decline reason: "Decline, and block has been extended to one week. Any more garbage out of you and your block will be extended further and this page protected. — Yamla 02:21, 16 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Please do not ask questions like you recently did at the Reference Desk. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, as stated there, "You might wish to go to Usenet or start a blog if you want to convince people of the merits of your favorite views." --YbborTalkSurvey! 20:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 21:44, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] No Personal Attacks Please

With regards to your comments on user talk:ybbor: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --YbborTalkSurvey! 21:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Question on the talk page

Several editors have expressed the view your question is not appropriate by reverting it so please stop re-adding it. You're welcome to discuss the issue in the talk page. Also you should read Wikipedia:Three-revert rule Nil Einne 22:07, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

I didn't see this message before reverting it again, but I think that was the second time. Could you explain why it is being removed other than because of editor's personal opinions?
No you have included it 5 times in total of my count. I would have suggested you do a self revert (as the policy suggests) but it's too late. The reference desk is not intended for soap boxing, and your original variant [1] strongly suggests this is your intention. Furthermore, the way you kept re-adding it despite the fact multiple editors had removed it, without attempting to discuss the issue first before re-adding it suggests your hardly acting in good faith. It appears you're well familiar with the unacceptablity of soapboxing on wikipedia [2] so please don't try to claim ignorance either. Nil Einne 22:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
I've never been banned for the 3-revert rule, which I didn't even know existed! And you are a faggot along with every other Wikipedian. Go be a "Wikipedian" while I burn your house down.
Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be further blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. --YbborTalkSurvey! 00:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 24 hour block

This IP address has been blocked from editing for 24 hours for revert warring and violations of WP:POINT. DurovaCharge! 22:29, 15 April 2007 (UTC)