User talk:71.177.247.31

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:
This IP address, 71.177.247.31, is registered to Verizon Internet Services. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts should be made to contact Verizon Internet Services to report abuse, which can be done here. Contact information can be viewed in the WHOIS report.
If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it is possible for the owner of the IP, Verizon Internet Services, to determine who was making contributions from this address at a given time.
If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

Contents

[edit] Regarding your edits to I Can Has Cheezburger?:

Your recent edit to I Can Has Cheezburger? (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 18:45, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to I Can Has Cheezburger?. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 18:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Sandbox, you will be blocked from editing. OnoremDil 19:03, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User talk:Onorem, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. freshacconcispeaktome 19:06, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] How sandbox edits can be considered vandalism

"Please do not place copyrighted, offensive, or libelous content in the sandbox"
Your ascii goatse and the last bit of racist graffiti you left most definitely qualify. Consider this your bonus last warning in case there was any confusion over why your edits were not acceptable. --OnoremDil 19:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Stop removing the speedy deletion tag from Talk:⟲. You're not going to get any answers by posting to a talk page of an article that doesn't exist. --OnoremDil 19:50, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 31 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.Caknuck 20:03, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I was just editing the sandbox. "


Decline reason: "Wow, what a nice sandbox edit! MaxSem(Han shot first!) 20:06, 12 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "He was making false warnings."


Decline reason: "Trust me these were true warnings. The proof is that you're blocked now. — -- lucasbfr talk 20:19, 12 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] Block extended

The little outburst in your last edit summary has warranted the extension of your block to 1 week. Please remember to be civil if you wish to contribute here. Caknuck 21:52, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to User talk:DerHexer, you will be blocked from editing. MER-C 08:52, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning.


You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. When the block expires you are free to continue editing if you intend to make useful contributions. However, if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, this IP address will be subject to a longer block.

-- KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 09:01, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

ELIMINATORJR 00:50, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "FUCKING ASSHOLES, I WILL KILL YOU"


Decline reason: "Congrats, with that, I'm extending your block to a month. — SQLQuery me! 15:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Template:Uw-tblock