User talk:71.177.147.64

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] May 2008

I reverted your recent edits to Steve Cooley. Though well cited, much of the changes did not meet neutral point of view guidelines and in particular guidelines that relate to living persons, both in tone and because they included accusations and criticisms from non-neutral sources. - Owlmonkey (talk) 20:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

I was talking about content not you particularly. I'll comment further on the talk page of that article. - Owlmonkey (talk) 05:34, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Im not sure how to use this but I modified my previous writings. I'm not sure of your professional editing qualifications but I happen to be an award winning columnist. If you care to help improve or bring more balance my contributions here I don't have a problem but to delete a writers entire entry appears you may have some bias in this matter yourself. I have reviewed other contributions made here and it is appears you are being a bit guarded with this article from it's inception? So excuse me if I ask are you associated with the DA or his Campaign, paid or volunteer? Ever? How is it you edit his party affilliation when his picture in this article boosts that affiliation?

Thank you for your comments on the talk page of that article, and for responding here. I replied to your comments there already, including your question as to my bias. As to the party affiliation, having a bold Republican in front of his name is inconsistent WP:LEAD guidelines. See the "Bold title" section of that style guideline for specifics. It's certainly fine to note that he's affiliated with the Republican party, and the second sentence already states that, just not in bold before his name. - Owlmonkey (talk) 07:52, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Ahh ok thanks.. now I appreciate this kind of guidance. If you have not figured out yet I'm new to this site. But I'm also an old worn out columnist also...lol71.177.147.64 (talk) 08:19, 6 May 2008 (UTC)