User talk:71.112.233.237

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, 71.112.233.237, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Sonic3KMaster 05:15, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Misuse of process

I've removed your objection to the ID article's Good Article status on the basis on your past tendentious disruption of the project:

As user:71.141.150.133: [1]

As user:Bloodwater: [2]

If you continue to use WP's processes in bad faith by raising tendentious, baseless objections, you'll be blocked for disrupting the project. FeloniousMonk 03:41, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

So wait, how does 71.141.150.133/Bloodwater's edits become my own? 71.141.150.133 is not my (current) IP address, nor has it been one that my ISP has given me in the past, nor do I recognize it in any way. How do you associate someone else's edits to me? Under what grounds do you make such accusations? I looked over the history you gave me on that number, and I can assure you that I did not make any of those edits. Compare the writing styles, and you will cleary see that it is not me.
My objection to the article had nothing to do with this other persons' edits, and removing it solely based on that was poor judgement on your part. My original opinion on the article still stands, and I would like the objection either put back, or permission to put it back. I am sorry if I sound defensive, but how would you feel if someone accused you of saying something you didn't? I harbor no malicious intent, and I fully support what Wikipedia is trying to do; I am simply tring to bring objectivity to an article that I believe does not have it.
OK, you seem reasonable and earnest here so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and restore your objection. If you aren't user:71.141.150.133/user:Bloodwater then you have my apology. If you turn out to be walking in his footsteps though, it's a different matter. FeloniousMonk 06:11, 16 May 2006 (UTC)