User talk:71.111.143.76

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Julia Roberts, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Quintote 05:22, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Vsmith has made arbitrary EXCESSIVE weeklong blocks with VERY VAGUE and misleading (no specifics) accusations (w/o foundation) of "vandalism" and a campaign of intimidation of newbies. His privileges need to be suspend indefinitely!"


Decline reason: "Since your edits are obvious, blatant vandalism, you have no grounds on which to request an unblock. Please do not repeat the request. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Julia Roberts, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Flyer22 06:49, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Dude, you're gonna get blocked. I would stop if I was you! Tech43 07:05, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Julia Roberts, you will be blocked from editing. Bovlb 07:06, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

You really should stop dude. Tech43 07:08, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Bolvlb has engaged in GROSS abuse of his powers by NOT having it shown Anywheres on his personal pages that he is an ADMIN (In essence sneakily hiding his Admin status) and capable of making Blocks and then making arbitrary BLOCKS (in conspiracy with other vandals) on contributing editors based on his own biases. HE SHALL be reported to the ARBcom and Wales IMMEDIATELY!!

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Bovlb 07:09, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

I hate to say i told you so, but I told you so! Tech43 07:10, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

And next time, if you want to insult me, try harder. Plain vandalism about my "unhealthy obsession with soap operas" hardly impresses me, especially since I have no unhealthy obsession with soap operas and those are not the only articles I edit. Your need to vandalize, knowing you were going to get blocked, is what is very sad. Flyer22 07:17, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Kirsten Dunst, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bongwarrior 23:24, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Gerald Fried. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Oxymoron83 12:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, you will be blocked from editing. OnoremDil 12:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Vsmith (talk) 12:36, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Jackie O is DEAD you Stupid idiot!! You think you're tough stuff pretending to bet a Vietnam Vet? YOu ain't seen nothing yet you miserable abuse of power piece of CRAP! You are going to be reported to ARBCOM, WALES, and the proper legal authorities!!!

How does a $2.8 million judgment for IIED sound to you and the lawyers fees will cost at least $800,000!! I'll see you in Court you dickhead!!

Your recent edits could give editors of Wikipedia the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a genuine dispute with the Community or its members, please use dispute resolution. Bovlb (talk) 22:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)