User talk:71.111.109.225

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[1]

You have recently vandalized a Wikipedia article, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

We hope that you will become a legitimate editor. Again, you are welcome here at Wikipedia, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.

If you feel you have received this message in error, it may be because you are using a shared IP address. Nevertheless, repeated vandalism from this address may cause you to be included in any future sanctions such as temporary blocks or bans. To avoid confusion in the future, we invite you to create a user account of your own.--Hu12 06:48, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chinese astrology

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.

Spam sock accounts

71.111.109.225 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log)
134.134.136.2 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log)
71.111.59.247 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log)
--Hu12 06:55, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Have you even read RJASE1 talk page about Chinese Astrology? If not, go to near the button of the page and read it and please place comments there.

Those links that I put back were there before April 5 and have been there for a long time. Those links have been through a long period of SPAM inspections from users and through many SPAM weedings. All I want is putting back the legitimate sites that have been through the SPAM remover process and survives. Read a little history of the page, do a little history research, before so quick in giving this blatant warning!

Why can't RJASE1 left them alone and put his other link, which is the same as link to another LINK FARM, to the bottom of the list?

There are no binding decisions on Wikipedia, especially when the decision was never discussed on the talk page. Just because nobody noticed this spam a long time ago does not mean you now have a "right" to keep reinserting it. Your contributions to wikipedia consist mainly of adding external links and is considered WP:Spam. Looking through your Multiple IP contributions as a whole, the majority seem to be external link related only. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a link farm. I assume you're here to improve Wikipedia -- not just to funnel readers off Wikipedia and onto some other site, right?--Hu12 07:20, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

--71.111.109.225 07:35, 13 April 2007 (UTC) External links serve a particular purpose that a wiki page does not serve. For example, there is no way we could copy sites based on databased calculation on to the wiki page without violating copyright rule. So a legitimate link would help enrich a WIKI's user experience by adding more value to the wiki page. I do not want link farm, I want legitmate sites that IMPROVES Wikipedia.


You said: Just because nobody noticed this spam a long time ago does not mean you now have a "right" to keep reinserting it.


Again, this shows that you did not even do any history research on this wiki page. The call for SPAM removal already went on for months on this page. Users did responded and they have been removing links that did not fit. All those links were looked at and they survived.

At least look at one month change history, please? please?