User talk:71.108.63.91

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Smile Foundation of Bali has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Captain panda 03:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Smile Foundation of Bali. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. John.n-irl (talk) 03:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Smile Foundation of Bali, you will be blocked from editing. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 03:09, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Jeepday (talk) 03:11, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Jack Merridew is a sock puppet of three banned user accounts, and all his articles should be deleted."

Decline reason: "Regardless, your editing is clearly disruptive. – Luna Santin (talk) 03:59, 31 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Smile/Bali

If you want an article deleted, request it using this wp:afd. John.n-irl (talk) 03:15, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

IT DOESN'T WORK, I TRIED IT BEFORE, AND SOME VANDAL ADMIN CLOSED THE AFD BEFORE ANYONE COULD EVEN VOTE! IT CLEARLY WOULD HAVE BEEN DELETED!
I havnt read the article so I'm not going to get involved with the content of it. If you can improve the article so it wont need deleting, do so. If it is a nonsense article and it is not being deleted, I would suggest you request help from an admin. John.n-irl (talk) 03:19, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
I don't want it to be improved. Jack spends all his time trying to get other articles deleted that shouldn't be deleted, so he deserves to get his own spam articles deleted that actually should be deleted because they are spam. He works for that pathetic little organization.
You cant ask for an article to be deleted based upon who started it. And the issue of conflict of interest is discussed here. John.n-irl (talk) 03:24, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
For the record, no, I do not work for that organization, although I have supported it. nb: this is User:Grawp editing on an IP. Cheers, Jack Merridew 09:10, 31 March 2008 (UTC)