User talk:71.107.62.213

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] WP:CIVIL

Rather, you seem to be the one that's not paying attention. I haven't written any articles on Kashmir, nor do I know much about it. I did not say the previous page on Kashmir was necessarily better than yours. What I do know however, is that you have been removing everybody else's stuff because you seem to think yours is ultimately better. Instead, please try adding stuff instead of replacing. Do you understand ?

By the way, your blatant bias is shown when you scream at me "MY PAGE IS BETTER THAN YOURS" on my usertalk. I do not wish to take action against you, but please refrain from yelling and acting immaturely.

Also, please stop removing my header on my talk page. It is frustrating to clean up after you delete things to make way for your yelling.

--PeregrineAY 00:46, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Please use more NPOV while editing. Have you read WP:NPOV yet? PeregrineAY 10:05, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Hello again!

Your edit on Kashmir was okay, but you seem to have deleted a perfectly fine section to make way for your edit! Here is your version. your version of the page Try to incorporate what's existing AND your information, okay? Thanks! --PeregrineAY 09:06, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Hello. On seeing your edit on History of the Kashmir region, I'd like to inform you of a Wikipedia rule, the 3 revert rule WP:3RR. Unless you edit the article properly with a neutral point of view instead of replacing what you don't like with what you want to see, and reverting to your version, you will be blocked. Thank you. And if you have any questions at all, feel free to ask them (civilly, not like last time) on my talk page! --PeregrineAY 09:12, 4 January 2006 (UTC)


Thank you for discussing the topic and refraining from personal insults. You see, because you think it's boring or that it runs too long, those are insufficient reasons to erase things. You are correct, I am not an expert on Kashmir, but just because the article doesn't list all the facts, doesn't mean you can erase other facts. Try adding a section instead of replacing one! Instead of removing stuff and typing what you want, like what you have done on my userpage, where you erased my header messages your edit, try to incorporate your information, with more neutrality, into the existing sections. Proper spelling, grammar and style would also go a long way into editors accepting your additions.

Tell you what, I won't revert your next edit to your articles. We'll see if other editors accept your changes, okay?

--PeregrineAY 19:45, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, 71.107.62.213, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

[edit] Terrorism

Hello. Please stop blanking information about Indian terrorists without due raeson. We strive to keep this encyclopaedia WP:NPOV. That means neutral point of view. Also, please refrain from attacking other groups. Thank you. Your other edits are excellent, however. --PeregrineAY 00:39, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] India

Hi. Although I am sure India is a country to be proud of, please refrain from getting this into your edits too much. Try to keep a non-biased point of view. Thanks. --PeregrineAY 00:48, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Well

Sorry but erasing sections on terrorists in India is not fair and balanced. Neither is stressing that Pakistan was part of colonial India before on every page, while erasing neutral content. You discussed the topic in the "Terrorism in India" article with its page. The discussion page for every article is the tab right enxt to the edit tab. Please try to keep a non-biased point of view. Thank you. --PeregrineAY 00:56, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

I did not write any of the articles, so I did not make Pakistan seem like anything. However, your changes to the articles are pushing the Neutral Point of View limit. A rhetoric question "Ever heard of the Aryan theory? Well it's a racist theory." doesn't belong in the Wikipedia. Please rephrase and make it less biased. Also please refrain from personal insults, i.e. calling me a moron. Oh, and better spelling and grammar would help! (Referring to both your edits, and your comments directed at me) --PeregrineAY 01:10, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Please. Stop editing articles with care and removing other sections and replacing them with yours! When you make an edit, you should make sure that the GRAMMAR remains correct, and that you don't DELETE things like a {{totally disputed}} notice! Also, Wikipedia upholds a policy of [WP:No_Personal_Attacks]] Refrain from childish namecalling please. --PeregrineAY 01:31, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Final warning

As per WP:Civility, I'm warning you for your personal attacks and profanity against other wikipedia editors in various talk pages, including:

  1. Talk page for user Peregrine and this
  2. Talk page at Gautama Buddha

Any further use of profanity and personal attacks would result in a blocking of your editing privileges. Thanks. --Ragib 01:41, 4 January 2006 (UTC)


You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires.. This is in continuation of the previous warning and your recent vandalism, use of profanity, and violation of WP:CIVIL at Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale and other user talk pages. The block is for 48 hours. --Ragib 04:00, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Become a User?

Perhaps if you got yourself a username, it will be easier to argue your beliefs and points on various topics. You have been making some very good edits, keep up the good work DaGizza Chat 01:58, 4 January 2006 (UTC)