User talk:71.107.163.121

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I didn't do anything wrong. I was reverting a vandal."

Decline reason: "Checkuser says otherwise. — Thatcher 02:23, 26 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

I do see some odd history, here, especially considering the prior {{checkuserblock}}, and that does seem to be an odd first edit off a one-month hiatus, but I'm not sure if I see abuse inherent in it -- looks like RyRy5 was editing the closing statement they made, at which point Collectonian reverted RyRy5 (who was editing their own comment), and then you reverted Collectonian's revert. Will poke around for some insight, here. Context will help make things more clear, hopefully. – Luna Santin (talk) 01:33, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Also, your rude edit summaries aren't exactly helpful. Jmlk17 01:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Also, all the edits here are vandalism.