User talk:70.79.22.51

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello 70.79.22.51, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Gdavidp 07:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC)


Thank you but I have not violated any policy. I am fixing the article as requested. 70.79.22.51 07:19, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Charles Manson

Do you plan to create an article in the very near future to fill the redlink you created? I note that the article on Colonel Scott has been deleted and protected to prevent its recreation. Unless you have a very powerful argument against that, I think the link should go. Also, accusing respected editors like MER-C of being vandals will not go down well. Please treat others here as you like to be treated yourself. Thanks. --Guinnog 07:34, 5 January 2007 (UTC)


yes I do. thanks for asking. 70.79.22.51 07:38, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

And will it be of the same calibre as the last times? --Guinnog 07:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Please do not be uncivil. We at Wikipedia have a no tolerance policy about that sort of thing. OGIBAD. 70.79.22.51 07:44, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

I wasn't being uncivil. The last few times the article has been deleted as being nonsense. Do you have any evidence that your one will be any different? --Guinnog 07:50, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Well maybe you can make me understand, seriously. They put up speedy deletion and say it disparages the subject. It doesnt and he is dead. I type Hangon and then they delete it. What the heck? 70.79.22.51 07:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC)


Check out some of the great links to our policies and principles you were given in your first message above. The article clearly did not meet our criteria. Sorry. --Guinnog 07:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

First, what do you mean our? You are an anonymous cog doing work for free for Wales, making you the butt of the thinking world. Second it did meet all criteria. It was about the father of Charles Manson. Instead of generic non answers and power trip grids, can you actually answer my question above? I will guess not. 70.79.22.51 08:03, 5 January 2007 (UTC)


I got a better idea Guinnog, let's meet tomorrow night at the Brunswick Hotel. You know where it is. I can bring CanadianTyro along and we can discuss the difference between wankers and a a girls blouse. See ya then! 70.79.22.51 08:20, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Nice. I might have to bow out of that meeting as I am many thousands of miles from the Brunswick Hotel. Meantime I've blocked you for 24 hours for disrupting our encyclopedia and for your persistent rudeness. If you decide to return after your block expires, please try to watch your manners a little more. --Guinnog 18:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)