User talk:70.59.33.63

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Public-access television

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.

Welcome. Perhaps your unfamiliar what wikipedia is. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia. Please see Wikipedia:NOT#DIRECTORY and Wikipedia:NOT#REPOSITORY, thanks--Hu12 (talk) 08:58, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


First, I did not revert even ONCE, let alone 3 times. I felt the section was lazily and hastily removed, and I copied SOME of the deleted content and replaced it. Then, when you deleted that section, I spent an hour cleaning the spam from it, improving the information, verifying the stations and their channels, and revising it before re-posting it.

Your behavior is very discouraging for someone trying to contribute to Wikipedia in a constructive and responsible manner. I have not reverted or un-done anyone's work. I'm trying to contribute and am clearly stating my motivations. I'm not going to debate with you, but I think more explanation is needed than a pompous, disrespectful statement that "wikipedia is an encyclopedia". I can show you hundreds of articles in wikipedia that contain lists of examples... and yet, I'm still open to hearing some reasonable explanation of why that list was not removed long ago, when it was reviewed for a featured article, and while rejected, no one referred to the list of stations as a problem with the article.