User talk:70.35.237.67
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Your edit to Atari Jaguar CD
Your recent edit to Atari Jaguar CD was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 08:32, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
accident —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.35.237.67 (talk • contribs) .
[edit] New Developments at Lexington, Kentucky
Your addition to the Lexington, Kentucky#New developments heading at Lexington, Kentucky will be removed in three days from the date of this message if citations are not added. As of right now, your statement(s) violate two official policies: verifiability and the original research principle.
Also see discussion. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Have a dispute? See resolving disputes. Your edit will be reverted since they once again fail verifiability, and the statement contains original research. Both are official policies of Wikipedia and therefore both statements will be removed, again. Introduce approperiate citations - here is how. Read these Wikipedia official policy pages before editing again. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 11:40, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Weasel Words
Do not add weasel words to the articles that you edit. Please read that offical policy carefully. Your edits to two articles were reverted. Do not attempt to reintroduce them. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 14:46, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your edit to Lexington, Kentucky
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 13:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your edits to Louisville, Kentucky and University of Kentucky
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 13:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Also note that Louisville, Kentucky is a featured article and any degradation will not be tolerated. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 14:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- Why don't you contribute to the articles instead of going through my contributions and adding [citation needed] or making senseless edits and/or vandalise pages? Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:44, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 04:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Kind sir, I am TRYING to contribute, but some seem to think of Wikipedia as their own personal domain and have power issues. I have never vandalized a page and see that as evidence you are on a major power-trip. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.35.237.67 (talk • contribs) .
-
- I agree with Seicer, especially with regards to Louisville, Kentucky. This is a featured article. If you think something isn't well-sourced, bring it up in talk or find the source instead of dropping all these bombs. I will not allow any degradation to this featured article. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 04:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- You have made it rather clear that you're not interested in facts. You keep saying two things are in E-town when they are absolutely not. And you also seem to not understand the concept of a metropolitan area, which major portions of Fort Knox are in. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 04:40, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Do not vandalise Talk:Louisville, Kentucky. It has been noted. Further vandalism or unfaithful edits will result in other action. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 04:24, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Richmond KY among many other cities are located in Lexington's metro, I will add those cities attributes to the Lexington article later tonight.
Also, what is the rule of thumb? The gold depository is 36 miles from Louisville's city limits... is that the standard? I would also like to add some stuff about Cincinnati to the Lexington article but it's 60 miles out. Is 40 miles the limit?
[edit] Vandalism to 70.35.237.67
Do not remove warning templates. It is considered a form of vandalism. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 04:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Blocked
You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires in 24 hours. FloNight 00:18, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Return after your block
Hello 703523767, I hope after your block you decide to stay and edit article according to Wikipedia policy and guidelines. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:
- The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
- The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you.
- The ability to start new pages.
- The ability to rename pages.
- The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
- The ability to upload images.
- The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
- The eligibility to eventually become an administrator.
- Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.
We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign your posts and comments with four tildes (~~~~) , which will let others know who left it. Take care, FloNight 15:13, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] College football championships
First of all, please sign your posts on Talk pages. Secondly, would you use only sources approved by the Republican Party in an article on said party? Would you use only Nazi approved sources in articles about Nazi's? Would you use only Paris Hilton approved sources in an article about her? I hope not. The same holds true for the NCAA. Third-party sources are very valid. If you think we are using an improper source or that a different source would be better, then please try to calm-down, please try to stop insulting people, and please try to make a coherent case for your opinion. Thanks, Johntex\talk 05:06, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |