User talk:70.35.196.93

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If these are "bots" or standardised posts they need tweeked as it is pretty insulting to those that do not realise "nonsense" is a robot or blanket response annonomys postings; If it is not then I cannot abide such pre-judg-us as vandalism aint the right word refering to the judiciary square artical. The Square is above ground as are the tourist atractions and such. The Subway station being the first station is interesting and informative but that is not to me a good enough excuse to redirect everything to that artical. Especially without a discussion as to why on the redirect page. It looks like a diversion. I posted links to albert pike's statue as he is more than a curiosity as the only confederate with a statue in DC (north of the river) and the street design thing is of note as well. To call such as this nonsense and or vandalism discredits wikipedia from my POV and seems to be biased. I noticed that the links stated after repeated postings.


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:41, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --AlexDW 18:38, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Judiciary Square, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Shadow1 15:23, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Judiciary Square, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. tmopkisn tlka 15:49, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

You simply don't understand that you're breaking a redirect. Your edits are also not valid. This is not censorship, it's cleaning up bad edits. You are not 'leaving' a link, you are breaking it. --Golbez 16:54, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Daniel Boone National Forest

Please take a look at Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy before making further edits to the article in question. And for all questions or comments you might have regarding the content of the article, please discuss your concerns on the talk page rather than inserting comments into the main body of the article. Thank you --Nebular110 16:22, 3 October 2006 (UTC)