User talk:70.253.165.71

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Your edit to The Fountain

Your recent contribution(s) to Wikipedia are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! —Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Your interpretation was original research. Please read the policy that forbids it. Your passage, however interesting it is, violates that policy. There doesn't need to be discussion on it, but feel free to start something on the article's talk page. You'll get similar answers. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Fuck you and fuck your policies, this site should be called Wiki-lies-apedia. I have never in my life experienced such biased bullshit, no matter what page you post on, all you hear is, "We dont care about the truth, only the consensus of our lies." You want neutrality move to Switzerland pussy! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.253.165.71 (talk • contribs) 18:31, December 14, 2006

Please do not be uncivil. Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral. The Fountain received Good Article status because we were able to cite verifiable information from reliable sources. Can I ask you something? Did you come up with the passage on your own, or did you see it somewhere? If you saw the passage somewhere, then it can be included in the article. It's just that Wikipedia doesn't allow original thought. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. ThuranX 03:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Fuck you and your neutrality too, Thuran X, you Borg drone! Signed, An Original Thinker —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.143.25.247 (talk • contribs) 14:50, December 15, 2006

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked for disruption. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 18:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Block this asshole!( ! ) You bunch of wiki-communists! Keep your fucking lies! This is America, home of the Free and the Brave! His truth is marching on! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.143.25.247 (talk • contribs) 18:17, December 15, 2006

[edit] Temporary block

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia because of disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. If you wish to keep editing here, please use your time out to read Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. If you can edit according to Wikipedia guidelines and without insults and profanity directed at other users, you are welcome to do so after this 24 hour block expires. More of the same can result in a longer term block. -- Infrogmation 23:40, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Neutrality Sucks and is Anti-American

Infrogmation this is your last warning. If you continue to print neutral wiki-lies, you will be blocked from entering the Kingdom of Heaven for promoting lies that are contrary to the Word of God. "Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees." (Matt. 16:11) - Signed, Elijah, 09:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)