User talk:70.251.162.103

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] March 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Jeff Gannon. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Real96 06:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning


I have researched James Guckert/Jeff Gannon very carefully. I only made factual corrections.

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.


I repeat: I only made factual and consistency corrections. You need to stop the other party from vandalizing the site. 70.251.162.103 04:11, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, which all articles must follow. Wikipedia is a neutral, verifiable encyclopedia; it is not a place to argue a particular point of view. Thank you.--Gamaliel (Orwellian Cyber hell master) 19:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Jeff Gannon. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Y.Ichiro (会話) 04:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Levine2112 discuss 04:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

I am attempting to make the language in the Guckert/Gannon article as NPOV as possible. I am trying to replace "claimed" with "stated" or "said". This makes the articles much more neutral and objective. 70.251.162.103 04:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Intentionally blanking the page twice is not what I would call improving the article. (you used the edit summary "Blanked the page" twice"). If you have a dispute, discuss it on the talk page. - Crockspot 12:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)